Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

P. 2037: Siren’s Curse tilt coaster announced for 2025!

Recommended Posts

I know I am going to get some backlash for this, and I am totally fine with that. I think CP should get a 4th dem coaster. I think RMC/S&S could make a very sweet coaster. I saw how the magnets control the flips on BTR at SFFT and I can imagine what they could come up with on a larger full circuit coaster!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather they develop the concept a little more before CP considers one. At this point they are very low capacity and may just seem like a "gimmicky" Gatekeeper to Cedar Point guests. I'd rather see an I-boxed Mean Streak before a 4D.

 

Also, what happened to the B&M 4D wing coaster rumors? I think Gatekeeper was originally rumored to be that, but it evolved into a concept in the planning stage (in the rumor mill), but I haven't heard anything the last year or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibility. S&S still owns the patents (via Arrow acquisition) for the "X Rail" I believe. B&M will have to find a different means of seat rotation. I have no doubt whatever they come up with will be smoother than the S&S/Arrow 4D coasters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is probably unlikely, but I did some measuring and a large scale ZacSpin like Insane can fit behind Millennium Force's first turn

I remember watching this Cedar Point documentary on Youtube and they had a bunch of coaster concepts on the wall. One of them was a few Zacspin layouts.

CPZacspin.thumb.png.e732c3a7a70146dbdf0b0b5bed31e1ce.png

Here it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont feel like a Zacspin or a Freespin would be right for Cedar Point. It just doesn't seem like a fit.

 

Unless that ZacSpin of Freespin coaster was a unique custom model made just for Cedar Point that can't really be "cloned"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CP is not going to waste time with a stupid Zacspin.

They're for smaller parks who don't have the funds for a monster coaster. Magic Mountain only got one as a cheap way to increase their coaster count.

 

I think Grona Lund got one because ZacSpins are compact, and they are great at managing their space. If they had room for a big coaster, they probably would have went with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Also, what happened to the B&M 4D wing coaster rumors? I think Gatekeeper was originally rumored to be that, but it evolved into a concept in the planning stage (in the rumor mill), but I haven't heard anything the last year or so.

 

They can always replace the trains if they feel the need to, however I don't think they would consider it for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Also, what happened to the B&M 4D wing coaster rumors? I think Gatekeeper was originally rumored to be that, but it evolved into a concept in the planning stage (in the rumor mill), but I haven't heard anything the last year or so.

 

They can always replace the trains if they feel the need to, however I don't think they would consider it for a long time.

 

I don't think they would add rotating seats to a Wing Coaster. Wing coasters are meant to mimic flying, and adding rotating seats would probably ruin that feeling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Also, what happened to the B&M 4D wing coaster rumors? I think Gatekeeper was originally rumored to be that, but it evolved into a concept in the planning stage (in the rumor mill), but I haven't heard anything the last year or so.

 

They can always replace the trains if they feel the need to, however I don't think they would consider it for a long time.

So, I assume you know the engineering involved in replacing trains on a coaster already much more complex than a traditional sitting coaster, with trains requiring even more precise engineering and calculations of forces? You cannot change the style of trains that easily; the Mantis to Rougarou conversion was the first example of this on a B&M (excluding Sheikra which is different), and I presume it is because Mantis was designed for a variable heartline as a stand up model in the first place, allowing for floorless/sit down trains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/