Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Any coaster/attraction that was a mistake from day one?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A few that come to mind

 

-Manhattan Express, though the casino seems to have no qualms about charging a small fortune to ride

-Gwazi - First few seasons and after the Millennium Flyer retrofit it was a good ride, but operations were slow and inefficient from day one and the Florida heat and humidity were not good to it. Turns out that there is a reason that wooden coasters don't work well in Florida

-Vertigo at Walibi Belgium - It was a new ride for 2006, 2007, and 2008, but only operated for a few weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KK- I mean who's idea was it to take a ride which was already a disaster for CP and make it bigger??

 

Superman The Escape-Opened a year late and never made it more than 65% up the tower until it was reprofiled in 2011. Not to mention the ride cost about $20 million in 1996, I'm sure thats close to $30 million in 2015..all for a ride that's not that thrilling (especially when it ran forwards).

 

Intimidator 305-Yes it's a great ride, but the GP isnt a fan of it, the ride cost millions in reprofiles, and it didnt get them the attendance increase they wanted. I'm sure if KD could do it over, they would've installed a cookie-cutter B&M hyper like Carowinds did that same year.

 

Re: Intimidator 305: How can you say you know how the "GP" feels about the coaster? How can you know if the park is unhappy with their attendance boost? How do you know KD even paid for the ride modifications? For all you know, Intamin hadn't delivered a coaster with the agreed upon forces, and ultimately had to deal with fixing it on their dime. I wouldn't put words into the parks mouth like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KK- I mean who's idea was it to take a ride which was already a disaster for CP and make it bigger??

 

Superman The Escape-Opened a year late and never made it more than 65% up the tower until it was reprofiled in 2011. Not to mention the ride cost about $20 million in 1996, I'm sure thats close to $30 million in 2015..all for a ride that's not that thrilling (especially when it ran forwards).

 

Intimidator 305-Yes it's a great ride, but the GP isnt a fan of it, the ride cost millions in reprofiles, and it didnt get them the attendance increase they wanted. I'm sure if KD could do it over, they would've installed a cookie-cutter B&M hyper like Carowinds did that same year.

 

Re: Intimidator 305: How can you say you know how the "GP" feels about the coaster? How can you know if the park is unhappy with their attendance boost? How do you know KD even paid for the ride modifications? For all you know, Intamin hadn't delivered a coaster with the agreed upon forces, and ultimately had to deal with fixing it on their dime. I wouldn't put words into the parks mouth like that.

 

I think Cedar Fair's relationship with Intamin (or lack thereof) since i305 speaks for itself...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drachen Fire-BGW didn't intend to have a ride operate for 6 and half years only for it to shut down and turn into a giant lawn ornament for another 4 years, then to have it torn down without any kind of modifications to at least give it a second chance. Shame too since this ride looked great (plus Arrow loopers don't really bother me at all).

 

Son Of Beast-The fact that GCI said that this was the craziest thing anyone has asked them to do is saying something. I'm sure they don't regret not building it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KK- I mean who's idea was it to take a ride which was already a disaster for CP and make it bigger??

 

Superman The Escape-Opened a year late and never made it more than 65% up the tower until it was reprofiled in 2011. Not to mention the ride cost about $20 million in 1996, I'm sure thats close to $30 million in 2015..all for a ride that's not that thrilling (especially when it ran forwards).

 

Intimidator 305-Yes it's a great ride, but the GP isnt a fan of it, the ride cost millions in reprofiles, and it didnt get them the attendance increase they wanted. I'm sure if KD could do it over, they would've installed a cookie-cutter B&M hyper like Carowinds did that same year.

 

Re: Intimidator 305: How can you say you know how the "GP" feels about the coaster? How can you know if the park is unhappy with their attendance boost? How do you know KD even paid for the ride modifications? For all you know, Intamin hadn't delivered a coaster with the agreed upon forces, and ultimately had to deal with fixing it on their dime. I wouldn't put words into the parks mouth like that.

 

I think Cedar Fair's relationship with Intamin (or lack thereof) since i305 speaks for itself...

Frank-Underwood-Eye-roll-GIF.gif.3957a1125195218d7039ad2fdaf18240.gif

They're not buying Intamin doesn't mean they are done with Intamin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though I never had the chance to ride it, I'm going to say the Rocket Rods at Disneyland. This sounded like a great idea at the time--a high-speed trip through Tomorrorland; then budget cuts and technical issues slapped Disney in the face. Now they're left with an ugly track and no Peoplemover.

 

Drachen Fire-BGW didn't intend to have a ride operate for 6 and half years only for it to shut down and turn into a giant lawn ornament for another 4 years, then to have it torn down without any kind of modifications to at least give it a second chance. Shame too since this ride looked great (plus Arrow loopers don't really bother me at all).

 

 

They did reprofile Drachen Fire, but too late--the damage was already done.

Edited by cfc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KK- I mean who's idea was it to take a ride which was already a disaster for CP and make it bigger??

 

Superman The Escape-Opened a year late and never made it more than 65% up the tower until it was reprofiled in 2011. Not to mention the ride cost about $20 million in 1996, I'm sure thats close to $30 million in 2015..all for a ride that's not that thrilling (especially when it ran forwards).

 

Intimidator 305-Yes it's a great ride, but the GP isnt a fan of it, the ride cost millions in reprofiles, and it didnt get them the attendance increase they wanted. I'm sure if KD could do it over, they would've installed a cookie-cutter B&M hyper like Carowinds did that same year.

 

Re: Intimidator 305: How can you say you know how the "GP" feels about the coaster? How can you know if the park is unhappy with their attendance boost? How do you know KD even paid for the ride modifications? For all you know, Intamin hadn't delivered a coaster with the agreed upon forces, and ultimately had to deal with fixing it on their dime. I wouldn't put words into the parks mouth like that.

 

I think Cedar Fair's relationship with Intamin (or lack thereof) since i305 speaks for itself...

[attachment=0]Frank-Underwood-Eye-roll-GIF.gif[/attachment]

They're not buying Intamin doesn't mean they are done with Intamin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did reprofile Drachen Fire, but too late--the damage was already done.

 

Duh, I completely forgot about the removal of the corkscrew. But yes regardless, I don't think there was anything else Busch could've done to save it (without throwing in more money into it which they already did).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Hypersonic XLC- Kings Dominion should have know it would be a bust b/c they brought the prototype. It didn't last long.

 

*Roller Soaker- Hershey had a good idea, it just never made sense in actuality. It ended up being a bad coaster and water ride.

 

*Stratosphere Coaster- Another grand idea-- building a roller coaster on a tower 1000 ft in the air but it was the most boring dry coaster ever.

 

 

**Side note I wonder when people on this board mention SFA's staff and visitors in such a negative light what they really means? The park is not perfect but when I see comments like that they feel racist and just coded language for too many people black people work and visit SFA. Just a feeling/vibe I get.***

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Zoominjoro-El-Toro (or however you spell it): Drop of Doom, also at Great Adventure...

Leave it to six flags to build a ride, only to find out the building code won't allow them to run it as marketed.

 

Twisted Colossus's Dueling feature...

Leave it to Six Flags to build a coaster they know they can't duel due to sh**y operations.

 

Ednor at La Ronde (and SLCs in General)...

Leave it to Six Flags to build an SLC in a park that already has a BTR clone, making one of the only surviving rides from astroworld an SLC.

 

Notice a theme here???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Zoominjoro-El-Toro (or however you spell it): Drop of Doom, also at Great Adventure...

Leave it to six flags to build a ride, only to find out the building code won't allow them to run it as marketed.

 

Twisted Colossus's Dueling feature...

Leave it to Six Flags to build a coaster they know they can't duel due to sh**y operations.

 

Ednor at La Ronde (and SLCs in General)...

Leave it to Six Flags to build an SLC in a park that already has a BTR clone, making one of the only surviving rides from astroworld an SLC.

 

Notice a theme here???

 

Clearly a SF Season Pass holder.....and my guess is a shareholder too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kingda Ka. Multi-million dollar gimmick that bleeds GAdv's ride budget dry year after year.

 

Can't help but wonder if this is part of the reason they haven't gotten any significant (brand new) coasters since El Toro. I mean Total Mayhem will be a solid attraction but it's still a relatively low-budget addition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if it's at least part of the reason. The rumors I've heard are that Great Adventure spent $75 million combined on their '05/'06 expansions--$25 mil for Kingda Ka, $25 mil for El Toro/PDC improvements, $25 mil in Kingda Ka maintenance and running costs for the two years.

Spending $75 million for the best wooden coasters (at least at the time) and an unreliable PoS is not worth the price, no matter how good El Toro is.

 

**Rumor--not necessarily fact, but could be**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aww you're no fun, just trying to get people to post more as suggested in your newsletter- I think my topic had a much catchier title! Thanks for finding and merging though, if that's what you wish, I didn't see anything on the topic when I searched but I guess I didn't look hard enough

 

It's painfully obvious that you're trying to just get attention with all the threads you're bumping and creating. Well done.

Yeah apparently if contributing to the site is attention seeking behavior, I am guilty.

 

I have not been on it, being a newbie to this whole thing, but I would have to disagree that KK was a huge mistake-- they would have just eaten the loss and taken it out if that were true. They must see something in it since it's still there.

 

When it first opened it was one of the most covered roller coasters in the world because 400 feet/100mph was unheard of back then.

I can attest to this (again I have not ridden it) because I distinctly remember seeing programs on science channel where they went on this ride and watched pennies "float" as they crested and fell back down. It was a big deal, that ride was amazing!

 

Sorry, didn't mean to ruin your fun, but if it means anything, I also like your title better.

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aww you're no fun, just trying to get people to post more as suggested in your newsletter- I think my topic had a much catchier title! Thanks for finding and merging though, if that's what you wish, I didn't see anything on the topic when I searched but I guess I didn't look hard enough

 

It's painfully obvious that you're trying to just get attention with all the threads you're bumping and creating. Well done.

Actually, he's doing a GREAT job of helping the forum and contributing to the discussion. When was the last time you created a new topic to help the forums thrive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/