AndrewRnR Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 Cedar Point has lowered height requirements before - Millennium Force opened with a 54" requirement which shifted to 48" towards the end of the season. So it isn't unheard of the park lowering things.
djcoastermark Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 Cp has always had odd height requirements as far back as I can remember. Case in point, back in 1969, as kids, my parents took us kids to many parks during the summer. Earlier in the summer we visited Geauga Lake, Euclid Beach and others, and rode the Flying Coaster (aka, Kangaroo at Kennywood) and had no problems getting on the ride or coasters either. However, when it was our turn to ride the one at CP, we found out we were too short to ride it at CP. Kind of hard to believe as we had just ridden Blue Streak ( in its buzz bar only days) just a few minutes before. So I don't believe it has anything to do with state laws or insurance, it's just a quirk that CP has had on heights over the years for some unexplainable reason.
JWAddington Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 I feel sorry for the workers that are going to be catching hell from parents because of this decision. Im just glad my kids are over 48" (49" and 52") so i dont have to deal with them being disappointed about not being able to ride a coaster that they were able to last year! This is ridiculous!
robbalvey Posted February 22, 2014 Author Posted February 22, 2014 Also lets remember that Ohio has very strict ride laws in order to let the park operate the rides, so if anything, we can blame worthless state laws... No. You blame Cedar Fair. They have done this in many other of their parks, not just the ones in Ohio.
SharkTums Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 Bad news, apparently, according to a Cedar Point News twitter- "@cedarpointnews: Iron Dragon's height requirement has been changed from 46" to 48" for the 2014 season." This is a joke, ridiculous, and makes me dislike the park even more. We all know I already have major issues with the majority of height requirements at this park and this is just a slap in the face. Why even bother bringing children under 7 to the park anymore!??! Are they trying to be like SFMM and get rid of families, oh wait, SFMM actually has more rides for under 48" kids!!! When a park makes me say something positive about SFMM I know there's a big problem.
eddie200330 Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 Hi, Believe me: we don't want to visit soak city, we want to ride coasters But the question really is: can i use the 'ride and slide 2 day-ticket' just for 2 days CP? Thanks again, Paul That is how we always did it.......never even used the soak city half.....
JonnyRCT3 Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 It's a rather mediocre suspended coaster. With OTSR. 48'', really? >.< Two inches isn't much, but still makes a difference. The ride is no different than it was last year, two years, or ever 20 years ago.
Ccron10 Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 Usually it is the manufacturer that sets the requirements for the rides and there might be a possibility in where the parks might further tweak them to make them more stricter. Since Arrow is out of business, I think that means that the park now has just about full control over the requirements now. It sounds like to me that they want to remain consistent across the board with their Arrow suspended coasters and changed it to be the same as The Bat. It wouldn't shock me if people who have visited CP, went down to KI and complained why their 47" child couldn't ride theirs. Judging from the ride experience, 48" is way too high for Iron Dragon, but as for Flight Deck/ The Bat, it would kind of make a little more sense, but then again SFMM's Ninja is lower.
GigaG Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 Also lets remember that Ohio has very strict ride laws in order to let the park operate the rides, so if anything, we can blame worthless state laws... No. You blame Cedar Fair. They have done this in many other of their parks, not just the ones in Ohio. They are based in Ohio, so could they be modelling their parks after Ohio state laws?
tarheel1231 Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 I feel sorry for the workers that are going to be catching hell from parents because of this decision. As do I. I can imagine the conversation right now: Worker: I'm sorry, but your son is too small to ride this coaster. Parent: NO! HE WAS JUST TALL ENOUGH FOR THIS LAST YEAR AND NOW HE CAN'T RIDE IT? BULLS**T, YOU'RE LYING! Worker: Ma'am, check the height requirement guide, I assure you this was not a typo. Parent: JUST LET HIM RIDE! I PAYED FOR THE TICKETS THAT PAY YOUR JOB AND THAT MEANS I OWN YOU! Worker: I don't make the rules. Ma'am we're going to have to ask you to leave or we're calling security. Parent: YOU ALL ARE WORTHLESS PIECES OF BULLS**T! I PAYED 120 F***ING DOLLARS TO GET INTO THE PARK, AND MY SON DESERVES TO RIDE! Worker: (Calls security) Hello, this woman is mad about the Iron Dragon height requirement. We need you to escort her out of the park. Parent: (as security takes her away) I'M NOT SPENDING ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR STUPID PARK! F**K ALL OF YOU! Ugh...... I feel bad for both of them
coaster-mm Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 That is how we always did it.......never even used the soak city half..... Thanks! Gonna order the tickets now...... Paul
rcjp Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 ^^Well, that's pretty dramatic but, yeah, it could perfectly happen.
DarienLaker Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 Well this kind of stinks, that Cedar Point raised Iron Dragon from 46" to 48", that really limits kids under 48" to Woodstock Express (with adult) and Jr. Gemini (I know it's going to called "Wilderness Express", but I'm still calling it "Jr. Gemini"!) when it comes to coasters.
Invertalon Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 Plenty of great photos from today's event being uploaded currently, can check them out here: I will most likely make a new topic soon with direct photos and such!
TheDarkMaxim Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 What are these buildings next to Mantis? Are they abandoned or do they have some current purpose?
Brassinthegrass Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 thanks for the relaxing afternoon train ride. nice way to spend a winter sunday afternoon... (who else watched the whole video, just because)
djcoastermark Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 ^ I did. Fun thing to watch on a lazy sunday. The second half of the ride has always been better, especially at night.
traincrossin Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 I like how the best theming at Cedar Point is on the train.
tarheel1231 Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 I like how the best theming at Cedar Point is on the train. Yes and that is why Cedar Point is an "amusement park" and not a "theme park".
larrygator Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 I feel sorry for the workers that are going to be catching hell from parents because of this decision. As do I. I can imagine the conversation right now: Worker: I'm sorry, but your son is too small to ride this coaster. Parent: NO! HE WAS JUST TALL ENOUGH FOR THIS LAST YEAR AND NOW HE CAN'T RIDE IT? BULLS**T, YOU'RE LYING! Worker: Ma'am, check the height requirement guide, I assure you this was not a typo. Parent: JUST LET HIM RIDE! I PAYED FOR THE TICKETS THAT PAY YOUR JOB AND THAT MEANS I OWN YOU! Worker: I don't make the rules. Ma'am we're going to have to ask you to leave or we're calling security. Parent: YOU ALL ARE WORTHLESS PIECES OF BULLS**T! I PAYED 120 F***ING DOLLARS TO GET INTO THE PARK, AND MY SON DESERVES TO RIDE! Worker: (Calls security) Hello, this woman is mad about the Iron Dragon height requirement. We need you to escort her out of the park. Parent: (as security takes her away) I'M NOT SPENDING ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR STUPID PARK! F**K ALL OF YOU! Ugh...... I feel bad for both of them I feel bad for the kid with this horrible parent.
Philrad71 Posted February 24, 2014 Posted February 24, 2014 Iron Dragon was a huge disappointment from the first time I rode it during it's inaugural year when I was fifteen. The only reason I thought that they were keeping it around was because it was billed as somewhat of a "family" coaster with a lower height requirement. Now that they are upping the height limit, I wish that they would just get rid of it as that real estate would be prime for something way better than an outdated Arrow coaster that never really thrilled to begin with.
GigaG Posted February 24, 2014 Posted February 24, 2014 Iron Dragon was probably my first "big" coaster, not counting Woodstock Express (which is not that small, or at least seems bigger than it does.) If it was a 48" height restriction at that time, my first coaster might as well have been Magnum (the first coaster I rode after I became 48" tall.)
NAMTABSFGAm Posted February 24, 2014 Posted February 24, 2014 What are these buildings next to Mantis? Are they abandoned or do they have some current purpose? [attachment=0]Untitled.jpg[/attachment] Boneville
gerstlaueringvar Posted February 24, 2014 Posted February 24, 2014 I guess they are trying to reduce the riders step by step and eventually remove it for low rider attendance...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now