Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Walibi Holland Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

^ Doubtful, the ride do have an inversion, but we'll see.

Why that? Because it's spinner trains? Or because lap-bars? Because both arguments are kind off invalid considering it's a done that been there deal. I do not mean to talk you down but just an observation.

By the way I don't believe these are the trains we're looking for, because they seem to be train based not single car based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I have a real hard time thinking those restraints would be qualified for a ride which flip you upside down.

 

As opposed to the same lap bar design on their standard looper train? The restraint itself is the same, it's just attached to an overhead bar as opposed to a bar connected to the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...it's just attached to an overhead bar as opposed to a bar connected to the floor.

I'm pretty sure that's the big difference and what makes it suitable for inversions. In case of a failure it opens upward instead of forward, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...it's just attached to an overhead bar as opposed to a bar connected to the floor.

I'm pretty sure that's the big difference and what makes it suitable for inversions. In case of a failure it opens upward instead of forward, right?

Um... RMC, Gerstlauer, Schwarzkopf, Intamin all did that.

 

I don't think it matters. The trains on the video are 95% not for Lost Gravity because the color will look disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As opposed to the same lap bar design on their standard looper train? The restraint itself is the same, it's just attached to an overhead bar as opposed to a bar connected to the floor.

 

The restraints itself it's not the same on the spinner and the looper.

 

It's also a big difference on the angle the restraints lock your body down with if it's coming from the front or from above. That's why all restraints who is not coming from above needs a knee-bar today if they wish to perform twisty inversions, unless you wanna do like Gerstlauer and build a really big bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why all restraints who is not coming from above needs a knee-bar today if they wish to perform twisty inversions, unless you wanna do like Gerstlauer and build a really big bar.

To add to this, another part of the reason why Rocky Mountain trains, Premier trains and Zierer elevated seating trains have the knee bar is because the cars have completely open fronts and are close together - freely-moving legs would be dangerous in those situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to this, another part of the reason why Rocky Mountain trains, Premier trains and Zierer elevated seating trains have the knee bar is because the cars have completely open fronts and are close together - freely-moving legs would be dangerous in those situations.

 

Correct! We could brake it down to two different bars:

aa.png.8ea9e523ed130c8cfe85139b9e64197e.png

Simple design, made to keep rider from sticking out their legs

ab.thumb.jpg.a9d13410dbedf57c6f1fcd1f1c5410b7.jpg

More advanced design, made to keep the rider in the seat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I have 2 things:

1: That would make any inverted coaster unsafe, because yes we're locked in but if I stretch my feet (wich I can because no Shin bar) I touch the car in front of me wich is turning individually.

2: There is a cover on these trains on each front end ( and back since it's spinner) wich would make these trains just as safe as Blue Fire Megacoaster trains are.

I'm just not seeing that problem, sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would personally guess that they are the same kind of restraints as on bluefire.

Mainly because it's probably the same kind of car they tested on bluefire, because since mack owns europa park

they can freely test on those coasters there. And developing a brand new type of car isn't cheap. It really isn't cheap.

So most likely they wanted to test it on bluefire before putting it on a brand new coaster to:

A: Test how enjoyable it is (if it is painful, etc.)

B: See how it works with the track

C: Other related

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Do we know when Mack did the spinning car test? The video was released at IAAPA, but for all we know the test could have been done long ago. I'm not saying it was, just mentioning it as a theory.

 

Spinning or not, this coaster looks like it's going to be absolute bonkers!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Do we know when Mack did the spinning car test? The video was released at IAAPA, but for all we know the test could have been done long ago. I'm not saying it was, just mentioning it as a theory.

Yeah, I'm in the camp that the video was shot pretty close to the IAAPA Attractions Expo, otherwise we would have heard about it, right? They made a big deal back when they first stuck virtual reality headsets on Blue Fire, and that was a while ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/