gerstlaueringvar Posted April 8, 2014 Author Posted April 8, 2014 (edited) A photo of Meg-Lite. Seems like they are making Mega-Lite into "Kawasemi without the water". Edited April 8, 2014 by gerstlaueringvar
glucky11801 Posted April 8, 2014 Posted April 8, 2014 A photo of Meg-Lite. Seems like they are getting Kawasemi without the water. Â Yes this Mega Lite has been there since August 2009. I rode it in Spring 2010- it remains in my Top 5...
Diamondbacker27 Posted April 8, 2014 Posted April 8, 2014 Looks extremely twisty! Or should I say, twisty for a B&M Â Hunter "twisty is a good thing" Barrett
gerstlaueringvar Posted April 8, 2014 Author Posted April 8, 2014 A photo of Meg-Lite. Seems like they are getting Kawasemi without the water. Â Yes this Mega Lite has been there since August 2009. I rode it in Spring 2010- it remains in my Top 5... Why did you quote my post?
COASTER FREAK 11 Posted April 8, 2014 Posted April 8, 2014 Because they aren't just getting the coaster. He was saying they got it in 2009, and he was referencing your post with his response.
gerstlaueringvar Posted April 8, 2014 Author Posted April 8, 2014 ^ sorry for making my post not clear. How about now? A photo of Meg-Lite. Seems like they are making Mega-Lite into "Kawasemi without the water".
Randomman295 Posted April 8, 2014 Posted April 8, 2014 Is it wrong to say that this is officially now on my bucket list? This actually looks really fun. Â I like how banked some of those turns look. What should we expect from the first B&M family coaster?? Probably well paced, and most likely isn't going to pull more than 3 Gs. Maybe we'll see a little low-G hangtime on those first couple hills?
A.J. Posted April 10, 2014 Posted April 10, 2014 Ugh huge watermarks. Â The coaster looks good though. It seems similar but different to the Vekoma models.
gerstlaueringvar Posted April 11, 2014 Author Posted April 11, 2014 If the cars will swing, the twits on this ride could be pretty wild.
robbalvey Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 (edited) To compare layouts... Edited April 11, 2014 by robbalvey
DBru Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Does anyone else think this ride looks kind of...ugly...from ground level? I mean it looks cool...but ugly.
Vigil Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Huh, it kinda does. It's like the uncanny valley for B&Ms. It should be a big roller coaster, but it's not. It does look a little...odd.
DanTheBooker Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 I know that this isn't any coaster vs. coaster going on but Freedom Flyer definitely has a better paint scheme. Â Maybe it's just me, but does anyone else think the transition from the camel back hump to the figure eight on the B&M just looks a little..... Funky?
KBrylczyk Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 It'll be hilarious to hear the B&M roar on this small of a ride.
_koppen Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 I actually think the Vekoma looks like the better ride here. Only time will tell..
RCF Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 While Vekoma makes the ride look better, B&M uses less supports and it seems to have tighter twists and turns than Vekoma.
Pyrozooka0 Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 It'll be hilarious to hear the B&M roar on this small of a ride. Â I think it will be more of a moaning noise. (it's preportional)
A.J. Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 Maybe it's just me, but does anyone else think the transition from the camel back hump to the figure eight on the B&M just looks a little..... Funky? I honestly think that it's the angle of the photo.
robbalvey Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 While Vekoma makes the ride look better, B&M uses less supports and it seems to have tighter twists and turns than Vekoma. Is it really that fewer of supports?
RCF Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 While Vekoma makes the ride look better, B&M uses less supports and it seems to have tighter twists and turns than Vekoma. Is it really that fewer of supports? Only by a few, like maybe 3 or 5 less. It's not a big difference, but it could have been another reason why they chose B&M.
gerstlaueringvar Posted April 11, 2014 Author Posted April 11, 2014 ^^ Maybe B&M signed a contract to build their family prototype coaster at Happy Valley while offered a lower price than Vekoma's?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now