cfc Posted January 4, 2014 Share Posted January 4, 2014 ^Back in the good ol' days before CGI--always preferred physical effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alejon Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 The country with most coasters per capita is Denmark, where there is one coaster for every 148 000 inhabitant. (Statistics from rcdb and wikipedia) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillseeker4552 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Manta at SWO is the only flying coaster with a mid-course-brake-run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcjp Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 By the way, does anyone happen to know why alpengeist's trains have an extra set of wheels in the front with no actual car? I've been thinking about that for a while but I don't know why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronWolfman Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Silverwood's Timber Terror was originally called "Grizzly" but to prevent conflict with Paramount, the ride was renamed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeagain? Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 By the way, does anyone happen to know why alpengeist's trains have an extra set of wheels in the front with no actual car? I've been thinking about that for a while but I don't know why. Â Because each row of seats only has one "set" of wheels. Each row is supported by its own wheels and the row in front of it. Because there is no row in front of the first row (duh...) there needs to be something to keep the first car level with the track.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillseeker4552 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Actually, there is a special connection between the first and second cars that prevents the front car from "falling" forward. That is how every other Invert does it. Â I believe Busch added an extra "zero" car on Alpengeist for theming purposes I guess. I believe it is the only invert with one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_IntaMAN_ Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Manta at SWO is the only flying coaster with a mid-course-brake-run. Â Isn't the brake run after Tatsu's helix that leads into the ending *technically* the MCBR for it? I heard that it's just used as block before entering the station though... Just asking! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcjp Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 ^^^What? Then how would you explain that every single other B&M invert has no such thing? It could be for an aesthetic reason (probably like Manta at Seaworld) but this one doesn't seem to be the case. Actually, there is a special connection between the first and second cars that prevents the front car from "falling" forward. That is how every other Invert does it. I believe Busch added an extra "zero" car on Alpengeist for theming purposes I guess. I believe it is the only invert with one. That does make more sense but still it doesn't do that much for theming does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillseeker4552 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 ^ No, it doesn't do much for theming, but who knows. Maybe they wanted 9 cars at one point, but scrapped the idea and left the zero car? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingRCT3 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 I heard it was a matter of forces (too strong forces in the first row) but I'm no sure. Â Actually, there is a special connection between the first and second cars that prevents the front car from "falling" forward. That is how every other Invert does it. That's how nearly all coaster trains work. That "special connection" is in the front on B&M, Intamin and most of them, and at the back on Arrow/Vekoma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillseeker4552 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Manta at SWO is the only flying coaster with a mid-course-brake-run. Â Isn't the brake run after Tatsu's helix that leads into the ending *technically* the MCBR for it? I heard that it's just used as block before entering the station though... Just asking! Â It's a brake run, but not mid-course, so I don't consider it one. Same goes for Leviathan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillseeker4552 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 I heard it was a matter of forces (too strong forces in the first row) but I'm no sure. Actually, there is a special connection between the first and second cars that prevents the front car from "falling" forward. That is how every other Invert does it. That's how nearly all coaster trains work. That "special connection" is in the front on B&M, Intamin and most of them, and at the back on Arrow/Vekoma.  Yes, but remember that a lot of sit-down coasters have a lead car, like B&M's Sitting, Hyper, and Stand-Ups, as well as a lot of Intamin Hypers, LSMs, and Looping coasters, with the exception of the Floorless and Dive coasters, in which I assume they use that "special connection". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeagain? Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Actually, there is a special connection between the first and second cars that prevents the front car from "falling" forward. That is how every other Invert does it. I believe Busch added an extra "zero" car on Alpengeist for theming purposes I guess. I believe it is the only invert with one.  But that would mean that the first and second car would remain at the same angle relative to each other. But from the pictures they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillseeker4552 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 Actually, there is a special connection between the first and second cars that prevents the front car from "falling" forward. That is how every other Invert does it. I believe Busch added an extra "zero" car on Alpengeist for theming purposes I guess. I believe it is the only invert with one.  But that would mean that the first and second car would remain at the same angle relative to each other. But from the pictures they don't.  If you look carefully, the area between the first and second cars don't have as much flexibility as between the rest of the cars. They can still bend a little, but not as much as the others.  With the exception of Alpengeist, in which the zero car acts as the "special connection" with limited movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingRCT3 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 But that would mean that the first and second car would remain at the same angle relative to each other. But from the pictures they don't. Â Check again, it's pretty clear from this picture: Â Â Yes, but remember that a lot of sit-down coasters have a lead car, like B&M's Sitting, Hyper, and Stand-Ups, as well as a lot of Intamin Hypers, LSMs, and Looping coasters, with the exception of the Floorless and Dive coasters, in which I assume they use that "special connection". Â A "special connection" (which is basically a pivot) or a lead car is basically the same thing, except one has a row on it and the other doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeagain? Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 But that would mean that the first and second car would remain at the same angle relative to each other. But from the pictures they don't. Â Check again, it's pretty clear from this picture: Â Â On that coaster. Not in this picture though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillseeker4552 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 ^ Yes, because, as said before, Alpengeist has a zero car, so the limited pivot point is not between the first and second cars, it is between the zero car and the front car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comeagain? Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 ^ Yes, because, as said before, Alpengeist has a zero car, so the limited pivot point is not between the first and second cars, it is between the zero car and the front car. Â I think we're saying (or your saying and I'm trying I say) the same thing. On other inverts, the lead car with the "special connection" has seats. Alpengeist doesn't, and has a extra row of seats to still have 8 total rows of seats. So the question becomes "Why Alpengeist?" To which we can speculate. I don't think it necessarily is for theming. I'd say it's more likely to do with the weight of the train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillseeker4552 Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 ^ Yes, I was just looking at it differently. Â As for it being Alpengeist, I have no idea. I guess only Busch Gardens and Mr. Walter Bolliger have the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3Mutts Posted January 5, 2014 Share Posted January 5, 2014 ^ If I remember correctly, the reason Alpengeist has the nose car due to it being so intense when they were testing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
netdvn Posted January 6, 2014 Share Posted January 6, 2014 From what I've been told, Alpengeist has a zero car because the park was afraid the original weight of the train without the zero car would cause it to valley in one of the hills, so a zero car was added to weigh the train down. Considering there are FAR more intense inverts out there without a zero car (Busch's own Montu being one of them - plus the Batman coasters), I don't think it has anything to do with intensity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcjp Posted January 6, 2014 Share Posted January 6, 2014 ^I guess that's a possibility. Still, even though alpengeist is not as forceful as other inverts, if flies pretty fast through the elements. In fact, it goes through the inversions more quickly than almost all inverts so I do find it a bit odd that the thought it could valley, it even has that trim on the top of the lift which didn't seem to do much when it opened (I'm saying this based on the videos I've seen) but now it trims it more than any other invert leaving the front of the train kind of "hanging" sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azza29 Posted January 6, 2014 Share Posted January 6, 2014 When I took the insider tour at BGW last year, I vaguely recall the guide (who seemed, at least, to know what she was talking about) saying the lead car was there to make the ride smoother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.J. Posted January 6, 2014 Share Posted January 6, 2014 From what I've been told, Alpengeist has a zero car because the park was afraid the original weight of the train without the zero car would cause it to valley in one of the hills, so a zero car was added to weigh the train down. Considering there are FAR more intense inverts out there without a zero car (Busch's own Montu being one of them - plus the Batman coasters), I don't think it has anything to do with intensity. The zero car is only there to add weight to the train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now