SharkTums Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 ^This was addressed at our Q&A Session at the DVD Relase Party Event. They said that it was in their long term plan to do something with the area, but not to expect anything in the next 3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbalvey Posted February 22, 2008 Author Share Posted February 22, 2008 Are there any plans to put SOME theme work in around Scream? Anything to get rid of the parking lot look and feel of the ride. This exact same question was asked during the DVD premiere last month. The answer from Jay was "It's something that's on our radar, not this year or next year, but maybe in the future..." Honestly, if you want to ask it again, perhaps the more they hear it the more they may realize that people DO want to see it happen. --Robb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coasterdude5 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 Thanks Robb for the interview. Shapiro seems like he knows what he's doing. I like how they're all upfront about how screwed up the old management was. Edit: ^ I think they could even market it like they did X2. It's a decent idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfmmrules! Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 Another Tony Hawk? When theres one at SFDK? SFMM needs to be more original than trying to copy all the other parks. Why not make SFMM be the top thrill park + have thrilling rides no other parks have. At least SFMM still has their De Ja Vu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIP Psyclone Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 Shapiro is definately taking the park and the company in the right direction, with the possible exception of showing old episodes of American Bandstand in the ride queues (lol). However, I don't agree with him in saying that a ride like Tony Hawk is specifically for 8-12 year olds. That is WAY too limited a demographic, and I know others have said the same. I believe that such a ride is supposed to appeal to 5-50 year olds, let's say. A "family" coaster is just that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYTrojan Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 I don't know, at least American Bandstand is better than nothing. You'd be amazed at how far a little entertainment in the lines can go. I loved the old cartoons they used to have at SFMM, but even a little music goes a long way. I went to Cedar Point over the summer, and they do a good job of playing music in the queues for their coasters. We spent about 90 minutes waiting for Raptor which gets their 'classic rock' sound track. During Billy Joel's 'Piano Man' I'd say about 70% of the line was singing along and goofing off with each other. I don't need to tell you what happened in other ride's lines when YMCA (another groaner) hit. That's the thing I like about MS. He seems to get that these small details make all the difference. You can build a 10 million dollar roller coaster and people will complain about your park afterwards if a few hundred thousand dollars worth of theming / line entertainment is missing. Is Bandstand way too corny? Definitely... but that makes it perfect for this sort of atmosphere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angryemobeaver Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 X2's new paint job reminds me of Firehawk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGA29 Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Here's an article from the San Jose Mercury News: www.mercurynews.com/ci_8336297?source=rss While nothing much new (although the Cyber Cafe sounds cool), it does confirm the addition of a coaster in 09. A new thriller will open in 2009, the first coaster since X debuted in 2002. Shapiro, who's not inclined to hop aboard X2 with its churning barreling turns, would only say the new one is more his style. More his style. Hmmmm. In the article he did say he wasn't too fond of inversions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillgeek Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Wow, that sure was nice of them to let you guys in. I'm really excited for the future of Magic Mountain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfmmrules! Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 I think we all know what it could be: Yet another Tony Hawk (more likely) since he kept mentioning Tilt A Whirl several times or the indoor mad mouse ride that Six Flags Great America is getting this year. Or a coaster like Revenge Of The Mummy. That would be cool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIP Psyclone Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 It still baffles me that Shapiro called Tony Hawk a ride for 8-12 year olds, when here he is, then 36, riding a Tony Hawk clone (albeit shorter) with his son Jack, then 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trcg721 Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Here's an article from the San Jose Mercury News:www.mercurynews.com/ci_8336297?source=rss While nothing much new (although the Cyber Cafe sounds cool), it does confirm the addition of a coaster in 09. A new thriller will open in 2009, the first coaster since X debuted in 2002. Shapiro, who's not inclined to hop aboard X2 with its churning barreling turns, would only say the new one is more his style. More his style. Hmmmm. In the article he did say he wasn't too fond of inversions. I wouldnt trust that article. Its full of errors, saying that X was the last thing installed. Did they forget about Tatsu and scream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbalvey Posted February 23, 2008 Author Share Posted February 23, 2008 It still baffles me that Shapiro called Tony Hawk a ride for 8-12 year olds, when here he is, then 36, riding a Tony Hawk clone (albeit shorter) with his son Jack, then 5. I'm guessing that what he meant was, that the "target" age is 8 to 12 year olds. That doesn't mean people outside the target age can't ride or won't enjoy it. Personally I think that demographic is a bit off. Tony Hawk's Big Spin carries a height restriction of 42", which on average is a 5 or 6 year old. I would think that the "primary target" would be more like 6 to 15 year olds. With a secondary being the adults. I would think that theme park marketing surveys would probably show that adults 21 and over would probably prefer bigger rides like Goliath, Batman, Tatsu, etc, that are a bit more challenging than Big Spin. --Robb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darklingscribe Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Great Interview Robb. It answered a lot of questions I had. My first reaction to Shapiro talking about getting rid of rides with with high running costs and low ridership was that Superman: the Escape might be one of the next attractions on the chopping block. I've always heard that the amount of electricity it takes to run costs the park a small fortune. I was not able to attend the DVD party, Was anything said about Superman? Also While I think a Tony Hawk coaster is a perfect addition to a smaller park like SFDK I worry that it is too low capacity for a big attendance park like SFMM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIP Psyclone Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Also While I think a Tony Hawk coaster is a perfect addition to a smaller park like SFDK I worry that it is too low capacity for a big attendance park like SFMM. Yeah, I think it is too low capacity for a park like SFMM to market it as a new, big, major, one of a kind attraction. I think the thing to do would be to open it with a major roller coaster as well, similar to what they did with X and Deja Vu (and misleadingly advertising Goliath Jr. as "new"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cycamps Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 I think that the Bluetooth trivia questions is a neat idea. I like the sound of getting to the front of the line!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbalvey Posted February 23, 2008 Author Share Posted February 23, 2008 Also While I think a Tony Hawk coaster is a perfect addition to a smaller park like SFDK I worry that it is too low capacity for a big attendance park like SFMM. Well, we will see how rides like Dark Knight do at giant parks like Great Adventure and Great America. My first reaction to Shapiro talking about getting rid of rides with with high running costs and low ridership was that Superman: the Escape might be one of the next attractions on the chopping block. I'm not sure who said this, but I remember someone saying that the cost of removing this ride is actually quite insane. Keep in mind, to remove it, they need to rent that *GIANT* 40-story crane again! I had heard that the Los Angeles area doesn't have many of those available (they are all in Zaragoza or Dubai!) so the cost of that is quite high. --Robb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christianscoasters Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 ^Hmm...You do have a point there about the crane. The only thing I can think of is this: TPR: When asked about taking out older rides - Mark Shaprio: "It's about taking out what's not working. The old philosophy would just let rides sit there and rot. We are going to go through our park and clean them out. We have a master plan. You might not see an immediate exchange, but in time we will fill out the park." So I'm kind of confused. I highly doubt Superman is getting taken out in the near future. Maybe they're saving money to get rid of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIP Psyclone Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 I'm guessing that Shapiro and crew have decided that S:TE is still popular enough to keep. It's really not *that* bad a ride, the length of the airtime is pretty much unmatched. I just wish they ran it to specs, and maybe gave it a little more TLC. I guess a paint job would have been a little cost prohibative, but then again a giant red, blue and yellow structure would be a bit of an eyesore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christianscoasters Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 ^Superman was my first "big" launched coaster, and I loved it. The launch was fun, and the airtime was awesome. I'd be sad if they took it out and I think it looks really cool too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roachman Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 Very insightful & interesting interview, Robb. The X2 pictures were awesome as well! Can't wait to ride it again with the new cars! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nagro5 Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 I have a question about the elephant ears. Have they already been installed? If they have been they look a lot different from the original X. In the pictures it looks more like a cover over the mechanical parts than a shield. I kind of like it, it adds a sence of danger to the ride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbalvey Posted February 23, 2008 Author Share Posted February 23, 2008 ^ No, I don't think they been installed yet. --Robb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebl Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 I just had a thought: Did they paint these chairs with the new 15-year paint? If not, they should! Think of how much longer they could go without repainting! Seriously, though, I didn't listen to the interview, but I'll say once again that I'm looking forward to the direction SFMM takes in the years to come. It will finally become the park it should always have been! About the clone issue...I wish people would get off of that. When will you "clone haters" realize that the parks are built for the enjoyment of the general public---most of whom know absolutely nothing about similar rides in other parks. Sorry to get...huffy...but even as an enthusiast, I have no problems with the same ride being at different parks. If it's a good ride, then who cares? Eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mynameistatsu Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 I don't think Tony hawk and Dark knight will come in 2009 (I hope not) ! I am sure Magic Mountain is more original than that. Tatsu is unique and so popular ! B&M = well there is still one missing : the Vertical coaster (like Sheikra and Griffon in Bush Gardens parks) could be a giant addition in the new few years... A new kind of coasters in the Six Flags ! Intamin = We could still hope for a Kingda Ka like, that would be perfect to replace the not so good Superman (and there are no loops on this) as it is higher and faster. And like you, I think a wooden coaster like El Toro is missing (Colossus is not really good and Psyclone was so bad). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now