zoidberg Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Nah, there's PLENTY about Full Throttle that can be discussed! Does anyone know just how fast the acceleration is (0-70mph in ___seconds)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MylesG4L Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 ^by the looks of the video it seems like it'll be just about 2 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuschini Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 I hate to be the guy who asks a million questions. But does anyone know the difference between LSMs and LIMs? Â The image below is the best description I've ever found reguarding the difference between LIM and LSM magnetic propulsion. Everyone can try and impress you with college terms, big fancy words and technical jargon but as far as actually understanding how they work: this takes the cake. Â From a reliability standpoint, LIMs do the job. There's only one path they follow and they all fire in line. But as you can see (referring to the numbers on the image) they take a high amount of power each cycle. Costly. Â LSMs or Synchronous motors are a bit more complicated (although these days with computers they're much easier to control) but take up much less power (referring again to the diagram) but require you to fire off the magnets "in sync" with eachother. These magnets are required on a ride like Superman at Magic Mountain because they both control the launch speed and the decceleration. This type of electromagnetic control was amongst the first of its kind on Superman, which, most of us know, plagued it with downtime. The synchronization is so precise that any kind of faulty speed or loss of car location caused a launch or return failure, resulting in magnets shutting off, and friction e-brakes at the end of the launch or behind the station stopping the car. Most novice visitors of the park are familiar with such events occuring on Superman. Â Â Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahecht Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 That's a nice graphic, but it's completely wrong. Â The LSM part is correctish. The electro-magnets behind and in front of the train push/pull big heavy permanent magnets on the train. The downsides are that, as mentioned above, the timing has to be very precise, and because you have to know exactly where the magnet on the train is, you can't have more than one magnet on a train. That's why most LIM rides are either a single car (Superman at SFMM) or use a sled to push the car (Rock'n'Roller Coaster). Â In LIMs, the electromagnets pulse in a wave, turning on and off in series like chaser lights: Conductive aluminum or copper plates on the train, through the magic of magnetic induction, try to keep up with this wave, accelerating the train to just under the speed that the wave is traveling. You don't really need to know where the train is, although most LIM launched rides closely monitor train position so that they can only put power to the electromagnets near the train and save electricity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuschini Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Based on your post I can't seem to find a description where you've differentiated LIMs or LSMs much differently than I have (although I suppose that blinking light graphic is a nice touch). I'm also not sure when "correctish" became a technical term. It might also be fitting to notice you neglected to come up with a description most people would understand, or a source that proved the nice graphic I shared was, in fact, "completely wrong." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vacoaster09 Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 That's a nice graphic, but it's completely wrong. The LSM part is correctish. The electro-magnets behind and in front of the train push/pull big heavy permanent magnets on the train. The downsides are that, as mentioned above, the timing has to be very precise, and because you have to know exactly where the magnet on the train is, you can't have more than one magnet on a train. That's why most LIM rides are either a single car (Superman at SFMM) or use a sled to push the car (Rock'n'Roller Coaster).  In LIMs, the electromagnets pulse in a wave, turning on and off in series like chaser lights: Conductive aluminum or copper plates on the train, through the magic of magnetic induction, try to keep up with this wave, accelerating the train to just under the speed that the wave is traveling. You don't really need to know where the train is, although most LIM launched rides closely monitor train position so that they can only put power to the electromagnets near the train and save electricity.  Yeah has always been my understanding... Also its pretty cool fact I just learned about Rock'n Roller Coaster.... I was wondering how they got LSM to work on that ride. Do you have any links that show this "sled" ... Does it work like a catch car but it has a permanent magnet on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guy T. Koepp Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Based on your post I can't seem to find a description where you've differentiated LIMs or LSMs much differently than I have (although I suppose that blinking light graphic is a nice touch). I'm also not sure when "correctish" became a technical term. It might also be fitting to notice you neglected to come up with a description most people would understand, or a source that proved the nice graphic I shared was, in fact, "completely wrong." Â My nomination for Doucheiest post of the month. But you may be able to argue that "Doucheiest" isn't a technical term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jzoole Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Douchy or not, I kind of agree that the explanation with the chaser lights wasn't very well explained. I didn't quite get the difference he was describing between LIM and LSM. The simple graphic made sense to me, but apparently that's all wrong. Bummer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJeXeL Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 MagneMotion details the differences in LIM vs. LSM operation and also covers the Pros and Cons of each system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jcsarchitect Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Went to SF:MM last week whilst visiting cali from England. Absolutely loved the park! Can't wait to go back next year. Â Lex luthers drop of doom is brilliant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefinitiveDetour Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 MagneMotion details the differences in LIM vs. LSM operation and also covers the Pros and Cons of each system. Â Problem Solved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gisco Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 MagneMotion details the differences in LIM vs. LSM operation and also covers the Pros and Cons of each system. Â My head hurts trying to read that. Seemed like I was back in school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJeXeL Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 ^LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyRCT3 Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 That's a nice graphic, but it's completely wrong. The LSM part is correctish. The electro-magnets behind and in front of the train push/pull big heavy permanent magnets on the train. The downsides are that, as mentioned above, the timing has to be very precise, and because you have to know exactly where the magnet on the train is, you can't have more than one magnet on a train. That's why most LIM rides are either a single car (Superman at SFMM) or use a sled to push the car (Rock'n'Roller Coaster).  In LIMs, the electromagnets pulse in a wave, turning on and off in series like chaser lights: Conductive aluminum or copper plates on the train, through the magic of magnetic induction, try to keep up with this wave, accelerating the train to just under the speed that the wave is traveling. You don't really need to know where the train is, although most LIM launched rides closely monitor train position so that they can only put power to the electromagnets near the train and save electricity.  I understand this, but that "christmas light" graphic seems to work exactly like a LSM. Explain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p0tat0 Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Im guessing no one read what I wrote lol.  A linear motor is essentially a regular rotating motor laid out flat.  Some definitions  Stator - part that stays stationary Rotor - part that moves   Both systems work on the push/pull concept. Induction motors require "slip" to produce torque, where the rotor moves at a different frequency than the stator. Sync, is the opposite, where the rotors moves at the same freq has the stator.  Ex: Household voltage is 60hz, meaning a sync motor would run at 60hz(this can be varying using other factors).  Note: They both are AC motors  Induction -Requires Slip -Stator is electromagnet -Rotor becomes magnetized through eddy currents induced by the stator   Sync -No slip -Stator electromagnet -rotor permanent magnet   Linearly they both work the same. Theres other technical advantages/disadvantages, but it would be hard to put it in layman terms lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UrbanLegend Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Does it make the coaster go? Yes? Good enough for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJeXeL Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 (edited) LIMs are more reliable than LSMs however not nearly as efficient because all stators are energized simultaneously regardless of vehicle position. LSMs are a lot more efficient as only the stators that are needed for vehicle movement are energized in synchronization with vehicle position. However, LSMs are more prone to down time due to "drive trips/errors." (Synchronization issues) Â ^This. Edited September 6, 2012 by DJeXeL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manic Monte Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 ^^LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theonetheonlyJT Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 Does it make the coaster go? Yes? Good enough for me. As long as you're not stuck 150ft in the air for 3 hours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustyinpeace Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 speaking of launch systems, has six flags announced whether Full Throttle's gonna be a LIM or LSM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustyinpeace Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 ^actually scratch that question i already know the answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GayCoasterGuy Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 Even with my degree in ME, I am completely confused and clueless at this point. Â But I will say this blinking graphic is GREAT. I could look at this all night! It's so purty! Â Attempting to get back on topic (anyone wanna ride bikes?), I'm curious to the difference in the system MACK uses on blue fire Megacoaster. Supposedly the energy absorbed at the final brakes is re-used. How much and do any of our US *magnet* coasters do that? Â Anyone know how much it costs to fire a train on one of these mag-launch coasters? Hrm.. now my brain is spinning. I wonder how much a standard lift hill costs. Maybe new topic time. Or bed time. Or time to ride bikes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArrowHater Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 Now if FT gets a superman rehab by turning the cars backwards the ride would be insane; while superman gets another fix by making the seats lay down like a vekoma flyer... Idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSum1_55 Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 I have actually thought of that approach for Superman. It would feel like a 1st generation freefall on steriods. However, the issue is they already have Lux Luthor. S:EFK is not an intense ride, but it is very "fun" to be able to look straight at the ground 400 feet in the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Clinksalot Posted September 7, 2012 Share Posted September 7, 2012 FT doesn't even open for AT LEAST another 7-8 months and we are already talking about flipping the cars backwards? Construction hasn't really even started yet. Sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now