verticalzero Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 (edited) How about this coaster train to say ride "Hydra". If the layout of the track can have low/medium G-Forces, this design should be ok. Let me know your comments, your prob think I'm nuts... Edited November 15, 2005 by verticalzero
PKIDelirium Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 That + SOB = Death Oh wait... Can't be any worse than Premier + SOB...
DragonKhan Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 http://www.rcdb.com/ig3050.htm?picture=5 Close enought?
DragonKhan Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 How is that dangerous? Granted, it's self operated, but if one can use common sense, nothing can happen. Remember! that's NOT in America
Alexander Nagel Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 ^ Not really, since it looks like a fairly tame ride (it's weird or I guess just differant the way it's constructed with so many cables. But it's not like we ever see anything like this in the state because people are stupid and sue happy. I'm surprized we still have as many Alpine Sleds as we still do, but you don't see them being built anymore and they are being removed one by one. Now this looks dangerous http://www.rcdb.com/id3148.htm Sure you probably don't go that fast but one slip and it looks like it would be easy to hit you head on one of the supports.
verticalzero Posted November 15, 2005 Author Posted November 15, 2005 These cars can be placed onto any Steel Rollercoaster tracks, instead of the normal trains, When your 200 feet in the air, it gets worring as your so exposed.
Homey G. Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 That's all fine and dandy til you have to do anything more than a 1.5 pullout on a valley and your chest caves in. Do you realize how uncomfortable if would be for your neck to have to hold the weight of your head in those pullouts too? I'm not trying to put you down or nothing, as new inventions happen every day, but I personally don't like any flying coasters that much for neck reasons anyway.
jarmor Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 LMBAO!! Tell your friend I have 1.5 million to invest in his design...
socalMAN123 Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 LOL! That would be a lot of fun and yet scare the living crap outta everyone! ---Brent 8)
Homey G. Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Not to mention, capacity would easily top 20 people an hour.... OR MORE!
cfc Posted November 16, 2005 Posted November 16, 2005 Hmm--looks like something SPECTRE would use to get rid of meddlesome agents from Her Majesty's Secret Service . . . "Do you expect me to talk, Blofeld?" "No, Mr. Bond--I expect you to die!" "You stole that line from Goldfinger." "Goodbye, Mr. Bond!" Bond is launched down the fiery tube of death!
nannerdw Posted November 16, 2005 Posted November 16, 2005 It's like a Volare, only above the track! :shock: This sort of reminds me of those boards that doctors use to strap people down for surgery.
niiicolaaah Posted November 16, 2005 Posted November 16, 2005 ^ Not really, since it looks like a fairly tame ride (it's weird or I guess just differant the way it's constructed with so many cables. But it's not like we ever see anything like this in the state because people are stupid and sue happy. I'm surprized we still have as many Alpine Sleds as we still do, but you don't see them being built anymore and they are being removed one by one. Now this looks dangerous http://www.rcdb.com/id3148.htm Sure you probably don't go that fast but one slip and it looks like it would be easy to hit you head on one of the supports. man that park has some really freaky coasters
SFMM rocks my socks Posted November 17, 2005 Posted November 17, 2005 Yeah like that will every happen. Besides all the wait for that ride couldn't imagine. But then again SFMM is that dum
DATman Posted November 17, 2005 Posted November 17, 2005 ^yes, because waits can imagine in the first place...
dropzone265 Posted November 17, 2005 Posted November 17, 2005 http://www.rcdb.com/ig1481.htm?picture=30 That looks pretty dangerous too. It pulls 6.3 G's I think it said
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now