Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

drechen fire


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've wondered this, and I don't mean this to be a personal bust on you, but why are people clamoring for Drachen Fire stuff? I, personally, never liked it. It was one of the roughest coasters I've ever been on. That one gave me a headache and a half from the repeated bashings against the horse collar restraints of doom. I know to each their own, I'm just curious.

 

Stuart "Killing cats left and right" Newsom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'm not one to care about roughness, personally. However, I think people are really excited by Drachen Fire for a lot of reasons. It's a very beautiful ride, with a lot of unique elements, that was new when it closed, and so few people ever got to ride it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Yeah, it does, doesn't it! I would've loved to ride that, too bad it's gone! A lot of times, don't coasters move a little bit slower when there's no people on board? Or is that just RCT The way that coaster is talked about, to take such a clear video with no bumping I'm thining that it was taped to the car!

 

In that case, maybe noone was on! Thanks for posting that video, I've always wanted to see that coaster in action!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've ridden Drachen Fire in both its incarnations. The first time it left me with two huge bruises on either shoulder, along with the soon-to-be-customary headache and feeling of disorientation. The only reason it lasted as long as it did was because a bald eagle built a nest on the top of the lift hill, so Busch had to leave it alone for a year (thanks to the Endangered Species Act). So, it did serve at least one good purpose before being scrapped.

 

As you've probably guessed, I do not weep for Drachen Fire. Anaconda at PKD is even worse, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Dooood!

 

There is hope!

 

Drachen Fire is featured on the Americas Greatest Roller Coaster Thrills in 3d dvd.

 

Do a search at cdnowdot com and it's there

 

Haha! I have that movie. It makes Drachen Fire look nice and smooth, but it shows the train coming into the station and nobody's smiling and those low trains look really uncomfortable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say the first cork into the drop looks far different and acts far different from their standard corks. It actually has a good parabolic shape to it that can be seen as it nears the middle of it, it gets tighter than untightens in radius.

 

Its almost like they modified it just because it had a drop as an exit but never realized that was a PROPER way to do a cork. That whole entire first part looks so smooth and I actually would bet its the smoothest part of the ride. After that you can just tell that the transitions would kill you.

 

 

So many people complain that Intamin goes "too" prototype but look at Arrow. They had Drachen Fire - Torn down. The Bat - Torn down. X - down for months. Their history is probably worse because so many modifications have been made to their existing rides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if it was rough, I think they still should have kept it. Isn't the area where the ride was just vacant anyway? Plus, they really could have used another coaster considering the lack of coasters they have now (they have more past coasters than current coasters!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if it was rough, I think they still should have kept it. Isn't the area where the ride was just vacant anyway? Plus, they really could have used another coaster considering the lack of coasters they have now (they have more past coasters than current coasters!)

 

So does Kennywood, Cedar Point, and a lot of other parks! Besides, it's quality not quantity! From what I hear Drachen Fire wasn't a quality rollercoaster, so it's good they got rid of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha! I have that movie. It makes Drachen Fire look nice and smooth, but it shows the train coming into the station and nobody's smiling and those low trains look really uncomfortable.

 

Those are the same trains as Canyon Blaster. They're not bad, it's the ride itself that sucked harder than a vacuum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drachen Fire was good looking looking ride on paper, in photos, and in person; that's probably why there's interest in what happened to this ride. The curves, turns and entrances into the loops were just not smooth. Every transition into the next element was abrupt. It just felt like a bunch of loops with poorly designed connectors in between that would just jerk you into alignment for the next element. There was so much of this ride that needed reprofiling to smooth out it was just cheaper to tear it down and put the money elsewhere. It would be interesting to find out what happened between Arrow and BGW on this one; who paid for the changes, was there ever a lawsuit, etc. Arrow had a pretty good relationship with BGW before Drachen Fire but I doubt they'll ever do business with them again. I think this coaster put a lot of nails in Arrow's coffin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only had a chance to ride DF on one visit to BGW, since I lived in CA the entire time it was at the park. I don't remember a lot of details, but I do remember liking the ride and didn't think it was all that rough. I also remember we were the only two people on the train, as like Kip said, I don't think most people visiting the park even knew it was there.

 

I'm sure if it was still around today it would be a skull destroyer of epic proportions, but I remember it back then as being a fun ride...

 

dt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most visitors didn't know Drachen Fire was even in the park unless they took the train ride which ran next to it, otherwise it was almost invisible. The ride really wasn't as bad as some say, it's just that better coasters were being built and this one wasn't even as good as Loch Ness Monster which Arrow built 14 years before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rode it from opening year until like 1997. I think its terrible reputation was not warranted. It was no rougher than most other Arrow loopers (GASM, Shockwave, Orient Express, Phantom, etc). It was a wicked coaster, and I miss it a lot

 

What always cracked me up was how BGW took out the corkscrew because the transition into the cutback was quite the headbanger. The problem was, the new track had the same tight turn before the cutback causing the same head bashing on the riders.

 

 

-kip-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/