Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

RollerManic

Members
  • Posts

    1,420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RollerManic

  1. Or level and extend the MCBR and create a launch out of it - solving both speed and capacity.
  2. YEESSS! It was an outside banked first turn! Will this ride midway create a shortcut from Montu to Cheetah Hunt or am I skipping something? Was the train/safari moved slightly?
  3. ^I don't know actually how long the park would have lasted anyway with Premier going bankrupt - I have the feeling this park would have been sacrificed.
  4. They did confirm it actually, just not super publicly Well... There's that. I guess I'll have to hold on the hope of a different US park getting T-Rex track! That was a long shot hope anyway to see a ride of such popularity and demand in Orlando be replaced by some prototype track design. B&M worked for this many years, year round, and that's their reputation.
  5. ^^Accurate dipiction if the meaning if trimmed as used by B&M haters.
  6. Can someone get pictures of the painted station?
  7. That looks sick. I love the placement and steepness of the intial rolling. It makes a sharp enterance and continues to crest as it rolls a second time. My guess is that this will provide an odd sensation of delayed airtime/forces relative to a typical zero-g roll / lie-to-fly.
  8. I would say that more realistically, SFI will build the first and CF will follow. And as discussed here so many numerous times, Iron Boss will not happen in any foreseeable future. SFStL is more likely to get the TREX - when pigs fly.
  9. The first element looks to be a 180 degree overbank. Anyone agree?
  10. Absolutely: SFStL Maybe: Holiday World SFOG (almost absolutely) Wish list for 2016: KI KK
  11. Do you think Six Flags will milk out a new paint coat on the restoration, or is Rev. not in need?
  12. Honestly I don't think that's so much the reason. Yeah, it's an easy go-to, but there's plenty of other rides with similar forces that garner huge waits constantly. I think the major reason the waits are that low are because it's all alone in a dead-end far corner of the park. You need to walk all the way to Flight Of Fear, then keep walking what seems like another half-mile* to get to the entrance of I305. If there were a path looping into the I305 plaza rather than it being a well-out-of-the-way dead end foot traffic would increase dramatically. * I've not been to the park since 2011, please forgive me if my estimates are a bit out of whack. Yes, your edtimate is a little whacky... Flught of Fear is in the adjacent plaza to I305. Prehaps you meant Dominator? It is best the way it is. You've come to a large amusement park. Walking is going to happen, and thats given. BUT - the secluded nature of I305's plaza as you speak is wonderful. Id much rather wak there than wait for the popular ride.
  13. Boomerang at SFStL. They were fine at first but now they're just grow off me and accordingly are abnoxious. Not to mention the signage.
  14. I would have loved to watch SFAW's Viper return home to SFStL. Also, if Ultra Twister could have been saved, that'd been wonderful.
  15. Although it is impressive looking I would hardly call it complicated. Nor is a brake run. I wouldn't even trust them to include the safety stopper.
  16. Hopefully SFStL and HW for CoasterCon 2016!
  17. Batman: The Ride at SFStL. New credit? Woodstock Express at KD.
  18. ^Opps! My bad. I mispoked. I knew that!
  19. The only thing those really long Zeirer trains were actually designed for!
  20. ^?? There's only two and one of them sucks.
  21. The dual tilt coaster has been confirmed to be a Vekoma for a while now (though correct me if it has changed). I've been very excited for a tilt coaster with a more substaintial layout!
  22. I would ride it if RMC remade it. Rough rides? Okay. Intense rides? Perfect. Intense and rough? Um. RMC could also do some kicka$$ reprofiling.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/