dr.gumbo

I like the roof, it makes the ride a bit more interesting than it would be without it.

Looks pretty impressive, I like the objects and the layout but I think you should change the texture of the temple buildings. The one you have now doesn't look that realistic. If you wish, I could make an environment for you (I need some practise).

Again, another great ride from you and by far your smoothest. The good -Immaculate trackwork. -Fantastic, original layout. -Great pacing. -Great use of AGH The not so good -I felt the two lifts made the ride end and start on a low note. -Some parts were left unsupported. -Some of the laterals got a bit high at parts. My Verdict Your best ride yet, both fun and 'very' smooth.

Does anyone know what's happening with this ride, I checked RCDB and its still listed as SBNO.

For me, it's line jumpers and rude ride-ops. EDIT: And people who save places for their friends and the ride op does nothing about it (arrogance + ignorance).

OMG, I think I've inadvertedly created a cult thread here.

And that's why TPR's so fun!

Can I request two nerd cookies? Seriously, that report was great entertainment for two minutes.

The park actually looks alright if it wasn't for the bad operations and what not, even though the sign seems to be the most colourful thing about it. Thanks for the reports, keep them coming!!

^ I agreed with you, although they do seem to be a little shifty as far as business is concerned (false claims ect.) I still think the parks a great place to go to. Besides, most of the complaints seem to be directed at the closure of Southport.

^ That actually looks really good, now I'm even more exited about it. Also, I think were certain that the other layout wasn't fake. Seems you can trust ECC when it comes to leaking info.

No offence but I do find that quite insulting and more to the point, illogical. Maybe you should read things more thoroughly before you try and make presumptions like that. After thinking about it for a bit, I think the site got a bit too much credibility for its own good. Not that I'm saying its a bad site or anything, I just think that the site shouldn't have attracted as much attention to itself and maybe they wouldn't have been pestered by the park.

^ Fair point, by no means did I think the site was perfect and maybe they could have 'cleaned' the place up a bit but I still think 'legal action' is a bit too far (If they tried reasoning with them, fair enough).

At first I didn't think of posting this here but since there's been a lot of talk about the 'decline in the park and management' for a while, I thought I'd post it here. www.tbppbguideforums.info/bpb/ From that they say, I think its a disgrace that they've driven 'loyal' fans to closing down they're site. It just goes to show how dark business can be. However, I don't know full details so I can't really pass an opinion.

^ Was it? Oops!

This is probably the most interesting thread for coaster geeks I've read in a while. All I've got 'behind-the-scenes' is a bunch of photo's of an under-construction for the year seaside park. Not really worth putting up.

Great photo's of a great park, both in terms of quality and interest. Good job!

Looks pretty impressive, I wish I could be bothered to do something like this. Are you going to release a video of this when its done? (even if its just a blur)

^ I would say so, considering he seems to know what he's doing. Back onto my opinion, I'd say it looks pretty good, especially the twisted elements and the airtime.

Incase you missed me the last time, I can help you with the judging.

Wow! The theming seems to be better than I thought it would be, and so does the ride. I can't wait to see how it turns out.

The ride itself looks neat and scary, but the fact that it lets you control the angle doesn't. Anyway, I don't really think the Stratosphere should bother, its too similar to the other rides IMO.

Try it again now, it should work (I'm assuming you were using the link download).

Here's a late review from me. (I've been away) The good -Very original idea and layout -Smooth trackwork -Fun elements -Nice station The not-so-good -Too many lifts for my liking -Took a while to actually get 'thrilling' -Weak banking (I saw a few yellow lats here and there) -Quite slow during the early sections My verdict Great idea, greatly done. 8/10

I think I'll join as a latecomer. EDIT: On second thoughts, I'll think I'll pass. I could help with the judging if you want.