raptor2011 Posted December 30, 2008 Posted December 30, 2008 So I was bored one night and decided to go on random websites and I go to Fuji-Q's website. I clicked on the english link and when I went on their attractions they listed old roller coasters that they had as current attractions and new coasters were not on it. Their old double loop coaster and the old "birdmen" (now hamster coaster) were still listed. Any ways are there any other horribly set up theme park web sites that you know?
nagro5 Posted December 30, 2008 Posted December 30, 2008 Websites that make me want to rip my "hear" out? Don't you mean hair?
raptor2011 Posted December 30, 2008 Author Posted December 30, 2008 Whoops, I did the spell check but I guess I should've read that part. Sorry about that.
disneymoc Posted December 30, 2008 Posted December 30, 2008 I think Lake Winnie's is pretty bad. Lakewinnie.com
niiicolaaah Posted December 30, 2008 Posted December 30, 2008 disney.go.com Takes way too long to load, and is confusing to navigate.
Teacups Make Me Sick Posted December 30, 2008 Posted December 30, 2008 Lakemont Park...it doesn't give you any info...and it doesn't tell ya if Leap the Dips is a working attraction.
davidmorton Posted December 30, 2008 Posted December 30, 2008 So I was bored one night and decided to go on random websites and I go to Fuji-Q's website. Its a mess FujiQ's site... BUT I have noticed this... If you go to Google and look for FujiQ you end up at this link http://www.fuji-q.com which is where it all goes wrong for you, as that site (and the English linked subsite) don't appear to have changed since 2004. But if you go to the Japanese link it takes you to http://www.fujiq.jp/ which is MUCH more up to date (still looks a bit old tho). You would imagine that the majority of the people looking for FujiQ on t'internet would be locals and so they would get to the Japanese site first off. (i.e. its only us geeky foreign coaster-geeks that would be hitting the 2004 English translation). Still, they should sort it out! Dave.
kidcoaster 2 Posted December 30, 2008 Posted December 30, 2008 Darien Lakes never wants to work for me
Guest Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 I like the content on RCpro, but found this hilarious: http://www.rollercoasterpro.com/about/jobs.php So do they fly you in for the interview also? Pay Allowance: Negotiable Regional RepresentativesRequired Qualifications: * Must 16 years of age or older * Be fluent in the English language
Sticky Nicky Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 Nickelodeonuniverse.com I second this. If it worked like it was supposed to, it would be great, but there is too much flash going on and everything takes forever to load.
Medusa1861 Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 I like the content on RCpro, but found this hilarious:http://www.rollercoasterpro.com/about/jobs.php So do they fly you in for the interview also? Pay Allowance: Negotiable Regional RepresentativesRequired Qualifications: * Must 16 years of age or older * Be fluent in the English language My favorite part of that webpage "Duties: RCPro Marketing Liaisons are responsible for designing and promoting marketing campaigns to increase market awareness of RollerRoasterpro.com and it's services and features." I searched, and rollerroasterpro.com doesn't exist..
Kennyweird Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 Kennywood Connection: The biggest collection of terrible, whining, narrow-minded Kennywood fanboys/conspiracy theorists the internet has ever seen.
coasterdude5 Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 Are these the actual park sites or fansites? Nickelodeon Universe is probably my least-favorite website, followed by the PARC websites. Coasterbuzz is my least favorite enthusiast website. Even the layout is bad.
dandaman Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 The Disney website is horribly slow-running for me, and equally bad to navigate. I don't mind bells and whistles as long as they actually work! (Cedar Point's Flash-based site seems pretty good for this, though; nicely designed with colourful pictures to distract me from the $3.50 soda and closed-due-to-drizzle attractions.)
Ccron10 Posted January 1, 2009 Posted January 1, 2009 Coasterbuzz is my least favorite enthusiast website. Even the layout is bad. I agree even though their podcast is half decent. I think they'd be slightly more popular if they got rid of the advertisments.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now