Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

I305forever

Members
  • Posts

    1,082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by I305forever

  1. ^ They don't KNOW, but you can assume it will based on its layout and manufacturer.
  2. Just a random question I have: When did they change Invertigo's color scheme? Didn't it used to be red and yellow?
  3. ^ Probably, considering how iconic Thunder Road is and how much more popular it is than Hurler at the park.
  4. I didn't know they would be around the same price. If they are like you say, then building a new RMC coaster would make a lot more financial sense than I originally thought it would. Sorry about that.
  5. ^ I'm 100% sure it was BGW. Maybe there was some other reasons they shut the rides down, but everyone I asked said it was because there was a big cloud.
  6. Complaining to her directly is kind of pointless. She probably just thought you were some random asshole who was tired of waiting in line and didn't change the way she was working because of it.
  7. ^Both have a Vekoma inverted coaster. Portaventura and Happy Valley Beijing
  8. ^ When I went two years ago, they closed all the coasters because there was a cloud so yeah, I would say they are.
  9. ^ I'm not a fan of those multi-launches. They just make the real launch less sudden and thrilling. Other than that though, it looks pretty good! Definitely worth BG's money.
  10. ^ I think it looks kind of underwhelming and bland. Also sign is spelled sign, not sing
  11. ^^^ Unless they modernized it and had it built by GCI, nobody would want to ride it.
  12. ^ I think them getting a S&S 4D coaster is more likely, I could see that happening too, although I don't see SF spending a ton of money on a brand new RMC when they could just Iron Horse a coaster everyone says is too rough anyway.
  13. ^ Wow! It looks a lot bigger than I thought it would, considering it's only about 120 feet tall.
  14. For some reason I only just noticed this, but isn't Carowinds totally lying their asses of when they say that Fury's ride time is 3:25? Because from every video I've watched, it appears to be way shorter than that.
  15. ^ (Although I can barely see anything) It looks really cool so far, especially the element you were talking about.
  16. ^^ It looks quite nice with water under it.
  17. Ok cool. The names aren't as bad as you said they were.
  18. ^ Great additions, especially the waterpark. Looks pretty realistic.
  19. ^ Is that all they've built or is there more?
  20. ^ But then they would have to pay them double. You know how stingy parks are about actually paying their workers enough to live on.
  21. ^ It doesn't look like park guest will be allowed to enter that area.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/