Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Recommended Posts

I know this is really old but what really happened to Kingda Ka? Why did it close for so long? I have been looking around and on Ultimate Roller Coaster I found this-

 

I would like to inform everyone of the truth behind kingda ka's closure earlier this season- which almost resulted in making the list for NJ's biggest busts of 2005 in NJ Magazine.

 

A tester who visited the park weekly to test the coaster sent the ride up with 20 dummies which then fell out one by one and reached as far as the Viper construction area. (VCA) Before re-opening the coaster- extensive tests were done with dummies and no dummies fell out. However, there have been several protests outside of Great Adventure with regard to closing this coaster due to rumors of it not being safe.

 

A staff member of six flags remarked, "Kingda Ka may be closed by the end of the season. And if it is closed again, it will be for good." What a 25 million dollar waste that would be.

 

Here's the link- http://www.ultimaterollercoaster.com/forums/cgi/forum1.cgi?read=162509

 

Can anyone tell me what really happened. I know know what it says really isn't true but I thouht it was funny so I posted it here. I don't think they would close down a 25million dollar ride for good when it was barely open for half a season. I just want to get my facts straight. Please help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Use some common sense. How plausible does that sound?

 

Did you also take the time to read the posts below that one? Its obviously a fake and someone just trying to get some attention drawn to their name. The rides problems were documented, just look around and get your info from RELIABLE sources, not forums (though these can be reliable depending upon who the info comes from)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, just read through the replies. I just scanned and got alot of information from it that seems to be correct.

 

As for direct information, you wont ever get detailed info. Park would never release anything more than the bare bones of what happened to appease the public.

 

 

Plus too much data is always bad. People distort it, like the above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wikipedia has it in a bit more detail:

 

A bolt failure caused the liner inside the trough that the launch cable travels through to come loose and create friction against the cable. The friction caused the train to not accelerate to the correct speed. The rubbing of the cable against the inside of the metal trough caused sparks and shards of metal to fly out from the bottom of the train.

 

The engine, as it is designed, attempted to compensate by applying more force to the cable to attain the 128 mph (206 km/h) launch speed.

 

The brake fins that rise up into the braking position go up on a timing pattern, independent of the launching mechanism. The fins are mounted in steel supports that are connected to actuators that raise and lower the fins into the desired position. There are four braking zones, and each zone has about 24 individual brake fins. The fins actually caught up to the launching train as the timing pattern of the rising fins was faster than the accelerating train.

 

The magnetic brakes began to slow the train in the launch area, and the engine tried to compensate even more, and dragged the train through the brake zones.

 

The catch car released, but the train was still in the brake zone and came to a complete stop at the bottom of the hill.

 

This malfunction occurred during a test run, no passengers were aboard. Damage occurred to the launch cable (frayed and needed to be replaced), engine (minor routine damage to seals), and brake fins (many needed to be replaced). The brake fins in the launch section are mounted in such a way to keep fast moving trains from moving backwards into the station, but a fast moving train being pulled forwards caused an unexpected stress on a number of fins that bent them forward. Not all of the fins need to be replaced, but there were more damaged fins than Six Flags had replacements, and had to be special ordered from Intamin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as things can fail, nothing is 100% safe. You can be close, but most times people are one burst hose or a bolt away from danger. Rocket coasters are no exception to the rule. Look at the two stratas. TTD chucked theming into the queue, sprayed shards of steel at people, and loves to pollute lagoons. Ka chucked brake fins into it's queue, scraped it's liner, and shot shards of miscelleneous metal around. All of those things were just "one of those things" where it was a small thing that went wrong and something big happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bashing TTD, or even trying to be argumentative...but,

 

Is it really a big detail? Ka's queue was empty at the time, so does it matter? Could TTD's theming have possibly flown into the queue instead? Was it designed NOT to go into the queue?

 

Both accident were random, unpredictable acts, So I don't see how the end result matters. Both accidents could have gone VERY differently.

 

And what about the people that got hit by flying shards of metal on TTD? Yeah TTD is MUUUUUUCH safer... At least on Ka noone was injured. That makes it safer right? Oh thats right, just another uncontrolable random act.

 

(I'm not bashing either ride here, I'm just pointing out that no ride is "safe")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/