Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know how RMC takes old wooden coasters that are past their primes and turns them into amazing hybrid coasters, but do you think they would rehab a wooden coaster and keep it a wooden coaster by using topper track?

 

Here's an unlikely scenario: Cedar Point wants to rehab Mean Streak, but they only have 2 wooden coasters and would like to keep them both. Do you think RMC could rehab Mean Streak using topper track so that it's technically still a wooden coaster? Just something that popped into my head.

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

^I think so. Why not? The shape of the two tracks is the same the difference being that on the topper track the only steel part is the rails themselves while the rest is wood. Topper track also appears to have the same capabilities (for inversions and such) so I assume they could also do it. Maybe the reason it hasn't happened yet is because going from a woodie to a hybrid is a bigger difference for the public while going fro wood to wood (no matter how different the layout might be) doesn't sound as "impressive".

Posted (edited)

As bad as Mean Streak needs it, anything would be much appreciated. I really hope they just demo it and add a GCI woodie.

Edited by TheDark8
Posted
I'm 100% positive they could. You know why?

 

Because they've already done it before

 

I think what he means is rehab NTAG-style (all new layout) but with Topper Track, not retracking parts (or maybe even a whole) and keeping the shape.

Posted

^he is the op

 

 

 

Outlaw Run, Goliath & Wildfire all prove that topper track can be just as effective as the i-box. I don't see the issue here.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/