B&MBoy1982 Posted March 5, 2014 Posted March 5, 2014 I like it all. If I feel it is a good ride, it does not matter which forces I am experiencing.
gerstlaueringvar Posted March 5, 2014 Posted March 5, 2014 It depends. Mostly I prefer airtime. Both Maverick and Outlaw Run do not have strong positive G's but they are incredible, incredible and incredible. But particularly for B&M, I would choose forcefulness over airtime. I really don't think lame floaters mean anything to me. Batman clones are much better than Sleeping Bull.
Dr. M Posted March 5, 2014 Posted March 5, 2014 But particularly for B&M, I would choose forcefulness over airtime. I really don't think lame floaters mean anything to me. Batman clones are much better than Sleeping Bull. Have you ridden Nitro though? I feel Nitro is an exception just because it has super solid tummy-tickling airtime over every hill, and generally avoids that "trimmed" feeling. If it's possible for you to enjoy B&M hypers, you'll enjoy that one.
rcjp Posted March 5, 2014 Posted March 5, 2014 But particularly for B&M, I would choose forcefulness over airtime. I really don't think lame floaters mean anything to me. Batman clones are much better than Sleeping Bull. Have you ridden Nitro though? I feel Nitro is an exception just because it has super solid tummy-tickling airtime over every hill, and generally avoids that "trimmed" feeling. If it's possible for you to enjoy B&M hypers, you'll enjoy that one. Nitro is a great ride. I found it significantly better than shambhala for the reasons you stated, plus the awesome ending with those 3 small hills. (and also the forceful helix)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now