Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm working on this Bugatti Veyron coaster. It goes 253 mph, soon to be 270mph, because Bugatti just recently released the Sport Veyron which goes even faster.

I plan on theming the hell out of this ride and adding stands along the mid course straight. This is just a video of the progress that I'm making on the ride.

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

While this looks AWESOME... I'm confused on a few things.

1. How are you getting the train to go 250 MPH? I thought the simulator capped LIM speeds at 126 MPH.

2. How is this going to be survivable? This could be fairly dangerous in those turns. You can't put more 5gs on a rider. Those turns are looking like 8+.

 

I'm anxious to follow this, and see where it goes

Posted

^

1. The unregistered version of the construction kit has a tool (The Power Tweaker) that allows you to put in speeds as high as you want...as well as forces as high as you want.

2. The G's never go above 5.9. If you watch in 1080p, you can see the force values pretty clearly.

Posted

The track barely fits on the map. I have to have the helix...

I trimmed it down half way through so I could have a twister layout towards the end of the ride.

Just look at the comments for the video on youtube; I've explained it a few times already.

Posted

And now presenting, the world's biggest helix!

 

No, I'm just joking. If I may make a recommendation though, DON'T bank the turn exactly 90 degrees. Make it a little less so you can take some of the vertical G's away and add some laterals. You can probably safely hit 3.5 vert and 1.1 lat. I don't really know though.

Posted

I should get the construction kit. I didn't even notice the force values. I should have paid attention to those. This could be a really intense, crazy coaster.

Posted

^^

It actually doesn't hit 90 degrees during the turn. I think the highest it ever gets is 75 or 80.

The thing about G's...

Vertical is only measured vertically relative to the train....(obviously)...and lateral is measured horizontally...

So, if you change the track from 5.9 vertical G's to 3.5 vertical and 1.1 lateral, you still put the rider under 5.9 G's, it's just divided between two accelerometers. If there was a third G-force measure in the direction of the net G-force, it would still read 5.9. Although, if I did that, people who only look at the color of the numbers would not be commenting on it any more. It's not really meant to be real and I can't really change it now, so I won't.

 

Another reason why this ride isn't realistic....

Each wheel of a car full of people who weight 150 pounds would be under roughly 3835 pounds of force during the 5.9 G turn. This combined with 253 mph = destroyed wheel barrings.

Posted

^ But remember, NL doesn't show rotational Gs but combines them with the lateral so there are really four different types of Gs put on a rider. Rotational, Lateral, Vertical and Acceleration.

 

Also, 150 lbs. a person for one load bearing wheel with four seats per car is a little unrealistic. There are ginormous people called ACERs and the love to try to fit in those seats so the weight per seat is nearly 300ish lbs. maximum. But you also need to factor in approximately 1/4 of each carriage's weight (frame, wheels, harnesses, seat, hydraulics, etc.) for each seat of the train (plus an extra 1/6 for the leading car) and then you have the minimum amount of weight/force that will be required for track and support integrity. But, there are more things to calculate. The duration of the amount of force, momentum, kinetic energy of the train.....By all means, have fun with it!

 

But I am certainly no expert.

Posted

I would have thought a 253+ coaster would be more than one stretched out helix. I understand the thrill and excitement of going that fast but if you dont have the space to make the layout able to take advantage of the speed it leave a ride like this...

Posted

Interesting layout - however.....5g Launch!?!?!?! How many necks do you wanna snap with that?

 

Also the hydraulics required for that speed in that short period of time would never work if Intamin made them

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/