chef kitchen Posted December 28, 2008 Share Posted December 28, 2008 I think it's a good choice to kill the project. I don't think it would of done any better than hrp. They planned on having 5-6,000 employee positions? gee that sounds kind of familiar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rollin_n_coastin Posted December 29, 2008 Share Posted December 29, 2008 ^^^^First off my apologies if I missed it but I totally must have--where in the latest article did it say that the project was dead? Isn't it just delayed? Yes, a delay on a massive project like this can last 5 to 8 years. Of course a senator who is completely against the park and voted against the special tax district law would comment on his assumption that it would fail. So one of many partners didn't return calls. If I was the paper, I would have tried calling another one of the many partners because obviously I've been calling the wrong one -- the partner that isn't the managing partner or doesn't deal with PR. I'm not commenting on whether it's a great idea or not but it just seems like it is only delayed at this time, pending that seed money as mentioned above. They need to raise it by 2016 before the special tax district law expires. Right now, I agree that it doesn't look too good. However, 2016 is a long way away and anything can happen. Look what happened in only the 3rd quarter of this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now