JT3000 Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Actually the last 3 times Sea World was the first to raise their prices with universal next and Disney last With the exception of once or twice, in history, Disney is ALWAYS the first one to price hike. SW is usually last. I can't remember the last time SW price hiked first. You may think they did it first because they waited so long to match the others. And WDW promptly raised their price even more. Neither Universal or SW has ever had prices above WDW, at least as far back as I can remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackcurrent Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 I wasn't being rude it's just I don't think its that big a deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disneyfan1313 Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 Actually the last 3 times Sea World was the first to raise their prices with universal next and Disney last With the exception of once or twice, in history, Disney is ALWAYS the first one to price hike. SW is usually last. I can't remember the last time SW price hiked first. You may think they did it first because they waited so long to match the others. And WDW promptly raised their price even more. Neither Universal or SW has ever had prices above WDW, at least as far back as I can remember. Trust me when I tell you that is incorrect. If you wish you can search the orlandosentinel archives for the information - Sea World was the first after 9/11 to raise prices and did so 2 other times as well. They had front page articles in the OS business section about it. Historically? Disney is usually the first - however that tide has changed recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shepp Posted April 15, 2005 Share Posted April 15, 2005 In regards to your argument about inflation: the reality is, new attractions cost money -- and since the new attractions are paid with inflated money -- well you can see the problem. Epcot alone in 23 years its been open has added hundreds of millions of dollars of attractions -- had the parks not changed at all your argument would hold more water. Criticizing the company won't change it. Jose Yeah, well, criticizing parks is intrinsic to coaster sites, isn't it? If I had a penny for every times SF has been criticized...I could afford to go to WDW. Epcot is actually an interesting example. Even granting that companies should pass through the cost of all improvements and investments rather than approaching them as part of the cost of doing (hopefully increased) business (in that case, you'd spend a LOT more to see Lord of the Rings than Sideways), there's a pretty big consensus out there that many of Epcot's changes didn't add much value to the parkgoing experience. I'm no great fan of TT, and though I really liked M:S, when I went, it was a total walk-on. And I doubt that many people would have celebrated paying jacked-up ticket prices for the abortive Imagination re-do, or the Ellenizing of Energy. Sure, supply and demand is king. And this year, when the Bushized plummet of the dollar is drawing increased foreign visitors to the US and fewer Americans can afford to vacation abroad, I bet WDW sees a nice spike in attendance. It's just that when WDW is raising prices at 500% of inflation, I can't get too excercised if a couple of people sneak into the parking lot, even though it's "wrong." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Eber Posted April 17, 2005 Author Share Posted April 17, 2005 O.k I found something better on ticket prices. Take Typhoon Lagoon ticket price in 1991 around 18 bucks Now its double that. For more ticket price info: http://waltdatedworld.bravepages.com/id99.htm Cool site. History of tickets. Something more innovative will come out and undermine disney. $60 bucks for a day is a lot. Now, if you buy the 7 day ticket -- that boils down to half that. Regardless -- enough people criticize the parks or park prices, something innovative will come out and outsell disney. Just a matter of time. Jose "will it be Dubailand?" Eber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackcurrent Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 The Disney brand didnt appear over night... It will be very hard for any company or themepark brand to overtake Disney's stronghold as the mark of excelence when it comes to Themeparks and themepark rides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT3000 Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 I can tell you haven't been to WDW recently. In all seriousness though. Disney will always be the most popular theme park chain in the world, simply because of their brand name. But I wouldn't be too sure about them remaining the highest quality product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackcurrent Posted April 18, 2005 Share Posted April 18, 2005 only able to visit once year due to living in the UK and yes every now and then they do let themselves down a little. but generally I dont think anyone can honoustly knock their high standards of ride design and themeing... I think Mission Space and T.O.T says it all... Outstanding quality which cant be matched.. and getting back on topic... well worth the $8 parking fee :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now