Okay, time once again for the new guy's point of view.
I think we are making and passing judgement on this new ride too prematurely and with absolutely no reason. Take a step back and understand that the Texas Giant is truly the first of its kind. Comparing the Texas Giant to Arrow, Vekoma or B&M is errant and irrelevant. I also think that applying Gerstlauer's track record on older wooden coasters to this project is foolish, considering we're now talking about a steel roller coaster.
Now, As to what I think is going on...The trains look to have a very large rolling stock, which I believe is good, as larger wheels tend to make smoother ride experiences. I would like to think that the side-fiction wheels would be in constant contact with the track, in regards to the aforementioned track bolting situation. In regards to alignment, I have always understood that until the support structure is completely adjusted, aligned and calibrated, the track cannot be. Again, I think we're making a mountain out of a mole hill on this issue, as no trains have been dispatched.There are some pretty hairy looking sections following the MCBR, particularly that turn under the lift hill and the "bunny-hop, airtime-inducing, bank/roll-switching, oh sh%&" camelback hills. I'm wondering if Titan's complete MCBR halt will bleed over, or can the magnetic brakes even do that? This coaster has always been a favorite of mine, both to look at and to ride. I get antsy just seeing pictures and thinking about the opening.