\
No one will belive you guys until you back it up with some proof.
And when we have the pictures of the final product, all of you guys will be like Wow...you guys were right. I am not here to post to spam the boards and provide false information.
As for the airtime hill, I am not too sure about it but as for the modification to another element, no turning back. The idea of it being retracked due to the accident does not hold water seeing that it was only the Robin side. And even you guys said it yourselves, that would be too costly to do a pair retracking.
I am really turned away here by the negativity of this thread. No one is saying you HAVE to believe us. Its perfectly fine to disagree. But when you start accusing us of lying and attacking us on our idea when there is no evidence to prove us wrong, then its getting a little carried away.
Chuck, dont even bother. If they are not interested in the topic then theres no point in trying to prove any points.