Ah, I know that Legoland don't have a say over anything Blackstone wants. But, this is a unique position. If Balckstone want to be Disney beaters, they've got two different ways to play it. Either, they push hard for integration between all the brands. The original merlin was going to buy out legoland as far as I was able to make out - but Blackstone bought Merlin before they did this. Note though that the rumours between the proposed buy out of legoland by Dubai never came to fruition - and therefore we must assume have been unfavoured by the Lego group. On the press release, lego didn't make a statement.
In short, the original sealife centres and Legoland made sense - so much so there's a strong possibility that Sealife centres will open in legoland from 2008. (The model makers are sick of making pirate ships for the fish though in return but Thorpe park and Legoland? It'll be interesting to see what happens next. Will Blackstone try to integrate the brands - or keep them very distinct. Still, the CEO Nick Varney must be very pleased - to have become the CEO of the second largest themepark business on the planet - from controlling Sealife centres two years ago! And is it a good thing that there is in effect from tonight a duopoly on themeparks in the world - Disney versus the Blackstone backed Merlin it would seem?! And what would occur if Blackstone bought a controlling share in Disneylands. Now that would be a deal and half