Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:25 pm
Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:29 pm
Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:33 pm
dougstanton wrote:kingsdominionlvr wrote:pkdcoaster wrote:That thick bar part is still there. it is just hidden by the angle.
the only difference I see is the enlarged "ear" pads
If you look at the seat directly behind the one I circled in the I305 picture, it does not appear to have the thick bar part.
If you look at the train in the concept art, it still has the thick bars for both seats in between the seats, like on Fahrenheit.
Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:47 pm
robbalvey wrote:I don't understand what the big deal is.
Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:01 pm
I don't understand what the big deal is.
Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:26 pm
Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:24 am
Josh Linn wrote:The main issue is, to me anyway, that there's a ride in the very same park that goes upside down 4 times and doesn't have OTSR's, yet a ride that has 0 inversions and has no need for them does...especially considering the fact that there are umpteen rides similar to it that operate with lap bars. The absolute best case scenario is that the restraints don't cause any discomfort and are basically just "there". In other words, they'd still be useless/pointless.
Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:26 am
netdvn wrote:Everyone complained about I305's layout when it was first announced.I don't understand what the big deal is.
Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:35 am
Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:51 am