Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Vortex Being Removed!
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 7 guests
Discuss theme parks, roller coasters, and mules!
What would donkeys be like on the moon?
User avatar
 
Posts: 232
Joined: 06 Mar 2015
Location: Utah
Gender: Male
Age: 23

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby pǝʇɹǝʌuı » Wed Sep 18, 2019 7:04 am

chschris1 wrote:I am in the camp that thinks that adding 13 more feet would have been advantageous for the park. Oh well, i'm sure it will be a hit for the park no matter what.


But would it have been advantageous for the chain? Remember that Cedar Fair isn't trying to make KI a destination park; it's doing just fine by drawing in locals. Remember, there's a 310 foot tall coaster 4 hours north...

the ghost seems to think there is a "Donkey Fairy"
 
Posts: 480
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 35

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby WolfBobs » Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:55 am

^^Exactly, KI has a HUGE pass base that comes out in big numbers for new coasters. Look at the crowds it drew for Banshee, Diamondback and Mystic Timbers. Two of which didn't break any records. Lose the mentality that coasters are built for enthusiasts and you'll understand more of the business decisions parks make. Why 300' is just as marketable to locals as 310 or 330'. Would making this ride 326ft tall really effect the experience all that much? Enthusiasts are the only ones complaining (and not all of us) that this ride isn't setting records. I'm sure this ride is helping season pass growth and that's all the park cares about right now until it opens.

Personally I'm stoked that this ride seems to be designed to be nonstop action from drop to brakes with some low to the ground elements. I think this has potential to be the most flat out FUN ride in Ohio. There I said it! lol

Don't let this donkey melt you with its laser eyes!
User avatar
 
Posts: 396
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Gender: Male
Age: 33

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby southpuddle » Wed Sep 18, 2019 9:05 am

If the only qualification for a giga is height above ground, would a 300-foot lift followed by a wild mouse layout with no drops count as a giga? Just an endless series of ever intensifying U-turns...

Drop length is all that truly matters.

If the donkey is rockin, don't come knockin!
User avatar
 
Posts: 994
Joined: 13 Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 31

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby Invertalon » Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:09 am

DILinator wrote:I think B&M's all have good to great forces, and Banshee absolutley is snappy and intense! Ya'll crazy! Lol If anything, the early B&M Inverts and Stand-Up weren't engineered as well as the newer models, which is why they have stronger, and not as pleasant to the average person forces. The newest B&Ms I've ridden have shown me a maturity in design, that they deliver strong forces, without being too intense for the average rider, which is who parks are installing coasters for, remember.


Aside from the initial whip on the first drop, maybe, Banshee is farrrrrr from snappy. It's like the anti-snap.

It's still intense, but intense =/= snappy.
-Steve

Can I park my donkey here?
User avatar
 
Posts: 40
Joined: 05 Sep 2019
Location: Charleston, SC
Gender: Male
Age: 28

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby chschris1 » Wed Sep 18, 2019 11:24 am

I think that over time it would have been better to actually make a statement with a larger coaster. That is just my opinion. I definitely am not complaining as I have never been to this park nor do I have plans to visit anytime soon. If this had been a bigger more intense layout I sure would have made my first visit. I think a lot of other would have done the same. Just look what Fury did for Carowinds in terms of media coverage, attendance, and respect amongst enthusiasts and GP.

In the case of Cedar Fair not wanting the park to be a destination park I disagree because I don't think they would be disappointed with new customers coming in from other areas. I think they would love that. I do see your point where they didn't go the extra mile because that is not their main goal. My issue is that I think they could have really gone the extra mile and made this a standout coaster. They already have Diamondback and I think it would have been a smart move to really set a new standard at the park.

Like I said I have never been to this park so maybe they don't need a 300 ft coaster and a 287 foot coaster will suffice.

Ultimately I think it will be a good addition to the park. I just think that making this a show stopping coaster, like they did with Fury would have been good for them, the chain, and coaster riders in general. I don't think it would have broken the bank to do so and I believe that it would have gotten them a bigger return on investment. I'm looking forward to hearing what people say about it. Maybe it will be better than I am assuming.

What would donkeys be like on the moon?
User avatar
 
Posts: 228
Joined: 17 Aug 2017
Location: Kaiserslautern
Gender: Male
Age: 34

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby Pedrinho » Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:42 pm

chschris1 wrote: (...) If this had been a bigger more intense layout I sure would have made my first visit. I think a lot of other would have done the same. (...)
Like I said I have never been to this park so maybe they don't need a 300 ft coaster and a 287 foot coaster will suffice.
(...)

I understand your point.. But you DO know, that Orion will be the same length as Fury until the MCBR, and that after the MCBR there's not much track that adds to the ride experience?
And truly NOBODY out of the GP, which is over 99% of the total attendance of any amusement park, cares how many inches short of 300 feet a coaster is? I would assume that 90% of all riders don*t even care (or know) how high the lift hill is.

So no, it really doesn't matter for CF, KI or anyone besides some (!) enthusiasts if there are 13 feet more difference between station terrain and the top of the lift hill then there will be now. People will come to the park because of Orion. And those enthusiasts who care will come and ride it, too. 300 feet or not.
Top: Wood: Beast|Mystic Timbers|Wodan|Twister|Phoenix; Dive: Valravn; Wing: Flug der Dämonen|GateKeeper; Launch: Top Thrill Dragster|Karacho; Floorless: Rougarou; Invert: Banshee|Raptor|Monster; Bob: Flying Turns; <200ft: Expedition GeForce|Maverick; >200ft: Magnum XL-200; >300ft: Millennium Force; Mine: Colorado Adventure; Boomerang: Raik; Hybrid: Cyclone
Bucket List: Steel Vengeance|FLY|Formula Rossa|Blue Gemini|Colossos|Kennywood|Hersheypark
Image

Can I park my donkey here?
User avatar
 
Posts: 40
Joined: 05 Sep 2019
Location: Charleston, SC
Gender: Male
Age: 28

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby chschris1 » Wed Sep 18, 2019 1:52 pm

^^ I disagree that the portion after the MCBR doesn't add to the ride experience. You get a decent helix, an awesome head chopper moment, and 2 more airtime moments.

As for the 13 foot part of the debate...I was just using that as a frame of reference. I expected this coaster to be at least 300ft, but thought, in the beginning, it would be even taller. With all that said, a good portion of those who go to Kings Island probably also go to Cedar Point. A 287ft coaster isn't really something that awe inspiring when you have a park in the same state with 2 other coasters topping that. If they had beaten Millenium Force's height I would feel different. I think that a lot of people would love to see at least a 300 ft coaster and 287 ft to me just isn't cutting it when you have Diamondback in the same park. Not to mention adding height would also make Orion faster...which I think it should be as well.

I think there are actually quite a lot more "enthusiasts" out there than people think. Just look at the view counts on youtube of people watching reviews, speculation, and vlog videos. On top of that look at comments, social media feeds, and how things have changed. Since social media has taken over, the enthusiast base has grown significantly. I don't think they are as hard core as some of us but there are a lot more people interested in parks and coaster than ever before.

Why do I still have a donkey title???
User avatar
 
Posts: 7400
Joined: 02 Aug 2012
Location: These Ozarks Hills
Gender: Male
Age: 34

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby ytterbiumanalyst » Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:26 pm

chschris1 wrote: A 287ft coaster isn't really something that awe inspiring

Really? Maybe it's time to find a new hobby....

For me, I'm pretty stoked about the new machine that can throw me off a skyscraper safely!
Image

Don't put that donkey on the floor!
User avatar
 
Posts: 1691
Joined: 29 Jun 2013
Location: Southern Illinois
Gender: Male
Age: 25

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby ZeroGravity55 » Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:26 pm

^ For real. No one is gonna be able tell the difference between 300ft and 287ft just looking at it. The sheer size of this ride will be awe inspiring to look at in person. For example, Valravn is a smaller ride in terms of height, but I couldn't get over just how big and imposing that ride looked from the humongous track and steep lift. To me, that's one of the things B&M does best. They build the huge, beautiful imposing rides that you could sit and watch all day long.

Can I park my donkey here?
User avatar
 
Posts: 40
Joined: 05 Sep 2019
Location: Charleston, SC
Gender: Male
Age: 28

Re: Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

Postby chschris1 » Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:48 pm

Just my opinion. I'm sure it will be a great coaster for KI.

PreviousNext

Return to Theme Parks, Roller Coasters, & Donkeys!

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 7 guests

These pages are in no way affiliated with nor endorsed by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Cedar Fair, Legoland, Merlin Entertainment,
Blackstone, Tussaud's Group, Six Flags, Universal Theme Parks, the Walt Disney Company or any other theme park company.

All onride photos and videos on this website were taken with the permission of the park by a professional ride photographer.
For yours  and others safety, please do not attempt to take photos or videos at parks without proper permission.

Disclaimer!  You need a sense of humor to view our site, 
if you don't have a sense of humor, or are easily offended, please turn back now!
Most of the content on this forum is suitable for all ages. HOWEVER!
There may be some content that would be considered rated "PG-13."
Theme Park Review is NOT recommended for ages under 13 years of age.

cron