Page 4619 of 4798

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:45 pm
by ytterbiumanalyst
coasterbill wrote:Parks do care about anniversaries from the standpoint of trying to sell sh*t and they almost always market them. The problem is that many people think "caring about anniversaries" means blowing the budget on a massive coaster just because it's an anniversary year which is ridiculous

I'm starting to think a lot of parks actually do less on anniversary years just because the anniversary itself is marketable and they don't need much beyond that.

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 12:48 am
by bluestreak
^ exactly my thoughts.
I look at it like this. It's your 150th anniversary. That's super marketable on it's own. You also want to build a giant new coaster, also extremely marketable. During the anniversary year you don't build the new coaster and then build it in the next year or two. That gives you two years of easy marketing.

Or the alternative is you build the new coaster during your anniversary and you only get one year of marketing out of the situation. I think it's pretty obvious that the park will always go with the former instead of the latter.

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 2:58 am
by prozach626
I pray that CP will get a new coaster for their 150th anniversary. I hope that new coaster is something similar to Kentucky Kingdom's Kentucky Flyer. It needs to be highly teased, so I can watch everyone on facebook lose their minds. That would be my 150th anniversary wish.

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:06 am
by AndrewA86
I agree that CP needs something like Kentucky Flyer, but didn’t the park or maybe even Tony Clark say it would top Steel Vengeance?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:51 am
by boldikus
ytterbiumanalyst wrote:I'm atarting to think a lot of parks actually do less on anniversary years just because the anniversary itself is marketable and they don't need much beyond that.


bluestreak wrote:^ exactly my thoughts.
I look at it like this. It's your 150th anniversary. That's super marketable on it's own. You also want to build a giant new coaster, also extremely marketable. During the anniversary year you don't build the new coaster and then build it in the next year or two.


:nina:

From an enthusiast standpoint, the park should build a new coaster. From a business standpoint, they definitely shouldn't bother. The anniversary and a billion awesome little things going on/being added/etc (the old school food items, maybe old school admission days, classic flats returning, parties etc?) is enough to get tons of people there. Tony has said at least once it is going to be more of a two-season event, going into 2021, so I could see them putting something large in the second year, and using 2020 to add/do a bunch of small things and also promote the following years big addition.

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:10 am
by southpuddle
AndrewA86 wrote:I agree that CP needs something like Kentucky Flyer, but didn’t the park or maybe even Tony Clark say it would top Steel Vengeance?


Do you expect him to come out and say “Don’t get your hopes up because the next coaster won’t be nearly as good as Steel Vengeance!” ? It’s marketing - don’t look to far into anything.

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 3:00 pm
by Vonni
I would still like to see an awesome GCI come to CP

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 4:14 pm
by AndrewA86
southpuddle wrote:
AndrewA86 wrote:I agree that CP needs something like Kentucky Flyer, but didn’t the park or maybe even Tony Clark say it would top Steel Vengeance?


Do you expect him to come out and say “Don’t get your hopes up because the next coaster won’t be nearly as good as Steel Vengeance!” ? It’s marketing - don’t look to far into anything.


I believe there will be some truth to it. “Top” could simply mean that it’s taller than SV. I’d like to see a Gerstlauer Infinity.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:10 pm
by ytterbiumanalyst
I think we're all reading too much into this. He said very plainly that it will be on top of Steel Vengeance. I'm hoping for elevators like the Kings Island Eiffel Tower has to get to that station 200 feet in the air.

Re: Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 10:09 pm
by bert425
AndrewA86 wrote:
southpuddle wrote:
AndrewA86 wrote:I agree that CP needs something like Kentucky Flyer, but didn’t the park or maybe even Tony Clark say it would top Steel Vengeance?


Do you expect him to come out and say “Don’t get your hopes up because the next coaster won’t be nearly as good as Steel Vengeance!” ? It’s marketing - don’t look to far into anything.


I believe there will be some truth to it. “Top” could simply mean that it’s taller than SV. I’d like to see a Gerstlauer Infinity.


it's a Top Spin to replace the Enterprise they removed! :p