Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Universal Orlando Resort (USO, IOA) Discussion Thread

P. 620: Our video of EVERY house from HHN 31

Recommended Posts

To add to this, I think when Disney was approached with the idea of Harry Potter they only wanted to add some rides and slap the Harry Potter name on it, but that's not what JK Rowling and WB wanted to do and why they ultimately went with Universal.

Where did you hear that? I highly doubt that is what Disney would've done, I'm sure they would've put just as much detail into the area as Universal did. I'm pretty sure the reason Disney declined the project was because JK Rowling is freaking crazy when it comes to her precious Potter franchise.

 

Read it a while ago but I had heard that Disney did not want to build a "land" of sorts and only a ride/ttraction in one of the parks. JK Rowling obviously didn't like this idea and opted for Universal's idea of two connected lands in the parks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at IOA July 8th, and it was probably the best day of the entire month to go. Longest line of the day was Forbidden Journey at 45 minutes, which, considering the stories i've heard of two hour lines, was an AMAZING discovery once I found it out. I had only been to this park once before, and that was a long time ago, way before I started riding coasters. So I got a few really fun new credits and an entire memory of this great park, not one in bits and pieces. Favorite ride of the day was a tie between the Blue side of Dragon Challenge and Hulk, with Forbidden Journey at a close second. (being a newfound Harry Potter fan) I hope to go to the other park and see Diagon Alley in a few years when I get to go back. Was the best park of my Florida trip, with Busch Gardens in second and Legoland in 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a crazy concept for the "Diagon Alley should have had more rides" arguement (either way)...

 

Remember that this land is at Universal Studios. USO isn't the "rides" park, it is the "movies and shows" park. IOA is the "rides" park.

 

My first trip to USO was back in 1996, and IOA was about 5 years ago. I live with a 15 year old Potter nut, have seen the Hogsmeade area back when it was the Flying Unicorn and not Flight of the Hippogriff, and so forth.

 

Obviously when they re-themed IOA and added 1 ride, they saw what it did to attendance and profits. They needed something for USO now to really kick it into gear. So they added a themed land and 1 ride dedicated to that land.

 

Throw in that people complained, or at least were disapointed when they couldn't actually ride the Hogwarts Express, and they had their idea for their first park-to-park ride system that fit the theme of both parks now.

 

So depending on how you look at it, they both got 1 "cutting edge" ride and a lot of theming. It sounds like Diagon Alley received a lot more of the theming to push the bar up, but as previously mentioned by others, this is to simulate the movie scenes as if they were real life. So it is back to replicating a movie experience through sets, shops, small shows, just like the rest of USO. So in that aspect, while I too would love more rides, I understand why they did what they did, and it really is the same number of new rides as IOA got with Hogsmeade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that this land is at Universal Studios. USO isn't the "rides" park, it is the "movies and shows" park. IOA is the "rides" park.

Right, but with the last few new attractions they've built from the ground up (Gringotts, Transformers, Hollywood Rip Ride Rockit, Mummy), they most certainly are proving that the old mentality of "movies and shows" is being pushed aside for more "rides" in the park. I would have to say the focus of USO has absolutely been more rides in the last decade or so, because, let's be honest, that's what guests want.

 

So I don't buy that argument for a second.

 

The theme of the park, since day one, has always been "RIDE the Movies!"d9a62dd949d8dc6cdfb4905fe9817273.jpg.61f9788f0b4aaf0fdd3f39aaac0dba52.jpg

Edited by robbalvey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Universal couldnt add more rides because they didnt have enough room for rides that would do the theme justice. JK Rowling would never allow a basic spinner in Diagon Alley or let Universal go out of their way (rather than work around current rides like Hippogriff) to make it seem more like an amusement park and less like a 'wizarding world'. Universal didnt have enough room in Diagon for more rides that would tell the story and leave JK/WB happy. End of story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I don't buy that argument for a second.

 

The theme of the park, since day one, has always been "RIDE the Movies!"[attachment=0]d9a62dd949d8dc6cdfb4905fe9817273.jpg[/attachment]

 

 

Good point. I forgot about that slogan. You are right again, Sir...

 

I can't wait for even more expansions to the park beyond the current HP stuff. So much speculation on how their "5 year plan" could play out. Bring on the rides, Universal! We love 'em!

Edited by nickbuol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although, that being said, they could always knock down that brand new team member parking garage they just built and expand another Wizarding World section out that way! Plenty of room out there! Even more room than the current Diagon Alley!

1348402397_ScreenShot2014-07-10at11_28_07.thumb.png.aa41412f7c722e02f4cb536be74fabdb.png

Edited by robbalvey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really excited to see what they do with Jurassic Park in IOA since Jurassic World is coming out next year. I just hope that whatever they do they can recycle the props and theming from the Triceratops Encounter. There is some great stuff back there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really excited to see what they do with Jurassic Park in IOA since Jurassic World is coming out next year. I just hope that whatever they do they can recycle the props and theming from the Triceratops Encounter. There is some great stuff back there.

 

 

I would guess tech-upgrades to the ride/animatronics. Maybe more weather-proof skins for the Dinosaurs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to this, I think when Disney was approached with the idea of Harry Potter they only wanted to add some rides and slap the Harry Potter name on it, but that's not what JK Rowling and WB wanted to do and why they ultimately went with Universal.

Where did you hear that? I highly doubt that is what Disney would've done, I'm sure they would've put just as much detail into the area as Universal did. I'm pretty sure the reason Disney declined the project was because JK Rowling is freaking crazy when it comes to her precious Potter franchise.

 

I remember something similar to this at the time. That Rowling wanted to require everyone who visited Disney's Harry Potter park to have a true-to-book experience which would have caused operational nightmares. Things like the entrance to the park being a one at a time walk through the Diagon Alley brick wall.

 

You can still see the impact of her demands at Hogsmeade... where all the stores are realistically sized, instead of theme park sized.

 

I swear this was a Jim Hill story, but the only good article I found was this: http://jimhillmedia.com/editor_in_chief1/b/jim_hill/archive/2007/06/01/why-for-today.aspx which doesn't go into detail about Disney's problem's with Rowling's ideas.

 

BTW, that article is also good for some laughs. I'm still waiting on the flying car ride at Sinbad's theater and the Pirates makeover of Adventureland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

To add to this, I think when Disney was approached with the idea of Harry Potter they only wanted to add some rides and slap the Harry Potter name on it, but that's not what JK Rowling and WB wanted to do and why they ultimately went with Universal. Universal took the initiative and created an immersive world that was built up to certain standards. Universal has always been about immersing yourself into the movie world, and if walking into Diagon Alley or MIB or Transformers doesn't do that for you then I don't know what will.

 

No, Disney wanted to (allegedly) make a ride utilizing Toy Stoy Mania technology with guests shooting spells out of wands rather than darts out of cannons. JK Rowling saw the space Disney had, and apparently was unhappy that they would not do more (rumors range everywhere from her wanting guests to take a boat to Hogwarts to wanting a whole HP theme park). Universal was much more willing to bend theme park conventions (make the stores tiny, implement unique technology), so she went with them. But Disney still was willing to do more than slap the Harry Potter name on lame rides. Rowling just wasnt happy with the interactive ride idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't know where any of the Disney rumors are coming from. I've talked with people who are fairly high up at both companies over the years and I've heard it simply came down to Universal willing to ante up the $$$ and that Disney just wasn't as interested in the property and the baggage (JK) that came with it.

 

I don't doubt that Disney would have pulled off something spectacular as well given some of the projects they have managed to produce over the years (New Fantasyland, Carsland, DisneySea, etc), but I also know that Disney likes to be a little more autonomous than I'm sure JK and WB would have wanted them to be.

 

Clearly Disney isn't afraid to spend the money on properties that make sense for them (Marvel, Star Wars, etc) but Potter would have only really given them Theme Park rights whereas those other properties they spent their money on are giving them a full compliment of entertainment rights.

 

IMO, I think Disney not going for Potter and going for Marvel/Star Wars instead makes perfect sense for them. I'm sure Box Office receipts are proof enough.

 

--Robb

Edited by robbalvey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^yeah, everything I've heard is just a rumor. But Im positive Disney wouldnt have simply slapped some weak theming on lame rides. I mean how often does Disney do that when dealing with big IP's? If anything, JK Rowling may have expected more from Disney considering how big they are and then was maybe more impressed with Universal's willing to do more with what they had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ From what I've heard, it was really more than Disney didn't want it. They seem to like to either buy properties outright or have full autonomy with a property that they license. I doubt that JK Rowling would have provided that.

 

And I really cannot think of many rides that Disney has "re-themed" from one property to another over the years. Superstar Limo > Monsters Inc comes to mind. Dreamflight > Buzz Lightyear is another. (But then they at least went and developed a stand-alone version of that for the other parks.) Probably the most obvious is Alien Encounter > Stitch only because of how bad that one turned out.

 

To be honest, if I was JK Rowling, I would have been a little skeptical of Universal after seeing what they did to a huge property such as The Simpsons! I still hope one day they finally rip out the simulator ride and give that property the really kick-ass attraction it deserves! (I can dream, right?)

 

--Robb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, if I was JK Rowling, I would have been a little skeptical of Universal after seeing what they did to a huge property such as The Simpsons! I still hope one day they finally rip out the simulator ride and give that property the really kick-ass attraction it deserves! (I can dream, right?)

 

--Robb

 

And it needs to be this.

34.jpg.5b0d034dbe127965ceb9fc3900fe1396.jpg

Arr!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ From what I've heard, it was really more than Disney didn't want it. They seem to like to either buy properties outright or have full autonomy with a property that they license. I doubt that JK Rowling would have provided that.

 

This makes sense. Universal was in much more of place to let JK Rowling and Warner Bros take control of the project, and it paid off for them. I think that both phases of Potter for USO opened up the resort financially and creatively, and no matter the franchises or lands built by Disney or Universal, competition is good for the area. The amount of development between Transformers, Simpsons, Potter, New Fantasyland, and Avatar is insane and is only upping the quality of parks that we and the general public are experiencing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ From what I've heard, it was really more than Disney didn't want it. They seem to like to either buy properties outright or have full autonomy with a property that they license. I doubt that JK Rowling would have provided that.

 

And I really cannot think of many rides that Disney has "re-themed" from one property to another over the years. Superstar Limo > Monsters Inc comes to mind. Dreamflight > Buzz Lightyear is another. (But then they at least went and developed a stand-alone version of that for the other parks.) Probably the most obvious is Alien Encounter > Stitch only because of how bad that one turned out.

 

To be honest, if I was JK Rowling, I would have been a little skeptical of Universal after seeing what they did to a huge property such as The Simpsons! I still hope one day they finally rip out the simulator ride and give that property the really kick-ass attraction it deserves! (I can dream, right?)

 

--Robb

 

 

If Groening would of been willing to sell the IP licensing rights in the mid 90's (during the shows peak popularity) which obviously he wasn't we would of almost certainly ended up with Springfield instead of Toon Lagoon. Bart Saves the World was a pitch in which guests would of boarded a bus (simulator) and gone on a wild trip through Springfield along side Bartman. Btw not saying you didn't already know this but more for those who may not of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Universal landing Harry Potter was the best thing that ever happened for the fans of parks around the world. It's created new innovations, competitions, and has officially raised the bar of theme park experiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Universal landing Harry Potter was the best thing that ever happened for the fans of parks around the world. It's created new innovations, competitions, and has officially raised the bar of theme park experiences.

 

Exactly. With Kong coming from Universal and Avatar coming from Disney there is so much more to come from the more recent surges of theme park expansion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Universal landing Harry Potter was the best thing that ever happened for the fans of parks around the world. It's created new innovations, competitions, and has officially raised the bar of theme park experiences.

 

Exactly. With Kong coming from Universal and Avatar coming from Disney there is so much more to come from the more recent surges of theme park expansion.

 

I think Hogsmede in Islands of Adventure really kick started Universal doing some truly detailed immersive environments. It did so well that they seem to have moved away from the "facades" idea and into whole themed areas.

 

First it was Hogsmede, then Simpsons and now Diagon alley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^I would have to disagree. As much as I would love to chow down on a KrustyBurger, and ride the coaster -o- death, I would rather see some of the already placed lands, more explicitly Jurassic Park, get some updates. In example, possibly get us a "tram" tour of the property, that, of course, goes hay-wire and goes into close quaters with the T-Rex(Or we could just hope for a coaster brought to us by Vekoma or B&M.). With the new JP film coming up I wouldn't be shocked if we get an attraction along with the new film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ From what I've heard, it was really more than Disney didn't want it. They seem to like to either buy properties outright or have full autonomy with a property that they license. I doubt that JK Rowling would have provided that.

 

And I really cannot think of many rides that Disney has "re-themed" from one property to another over the years. Superstar Limo > Monsters Inc comes to mind. Dreamflight > Buzz Lightyear is another. (But then they at least went and developed a stand-alone version of that for the other parks.) Probably the most obvious is Alien Encounter > Stitch only because of how bad that one turned out.

 

To be honest, if I was JK Rowling, I would have been a little skeptical of Universal after seeing what they did to a huge property such as The Simpsons! I still hope one day they finally rip out the simulator ride and give that property the really kick-ass attraction it deserves! (I can dream, right?)

 

--Robb

 

 

If Groening would of been willing to sell the IP licensing rights in the mid 90's (during the shows peak popularity) which obviously he wasn't we would of almost certainly ended up with Springfield instead of Toon Lagoon. Bart Saves the World was a pitch in which guests would of boarded a bus (simulator) and gone on a wild trip through Springfield along side Bartman. Btw not saying you didn't already know this but more for those who may not of.

 

That would have been AMAZING! Hope it call still happen at some point. I agree with Robb...put BTTF out of its misery and use the land for a much better Simpsons ride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • coasterbill changed the title to Universal Orlando Resort (USO, IOA) Discussion Thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/