jedimaster1227 Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 Can't say I ever expected to see B&M creating trains for a coaster like this. And it looks pretty good! Curious to hear if the ride experience has improved at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CpBluestreakCp Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 Seems like it should be an improvement from what it was before, guess we'll just have to wait for that first review of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubysparkles Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 I bet they want 8 clicks on the damn things though, like Shambhala. These restraints aren't so great for people who are pear shaped. Interested to see how that seatbelt and leg restraints feel though. Hopefully it will be an improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnage Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 The height limits went from above 130 cm with the old trains, to 140 - 185 cm, yes you read right, not only did they raise the lower limit which means that some have to wait a bit longer to ride it, but they put a very low upper limit (lover than Atlantis Adventure even), so sorry tall people. Wonder how strict they are though, Lotte World is very strict, there might be a chance that Nagashima Spaland may be as well Source is the ride page at: http://www.nagashima-onsen.co.jp  If true on the new height limits, I'm glad I got to ride it when I did.  The trains look like an improvement, though I don't like the look of the shin restraints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B&MIntaminGCI Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Wow, it's so weird to see a 2x2 inline B&M train. I bet this makes the ride experience a lot better. Â The only thing is a 185cm height restriction, that's 6' 1".... That's not very tall and I'm 6' 1" myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GigaG Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 B&M trains are the best trains on the market, and I think every hyper coaster should have them, even Intamin hypers. (Although Intamin does make better layouts, B&M makes superior trains)Â I would love to see other Morgan coasters, such as the Cedar Fair Morgan trio, receive these trains. They have potential to be very solid rides, but the coffin trains do hinder the experience. Although I do like Phantom's Revenge's trains, just about anything would be an improvement over Magnum's trains. However, some of the annoying CP fanboys would probably kick and scream about ruining a classic to make it a good ride. Â I am an "annoying CP fanboy" and I'm proud! Â All fanboying aside, the "bash bars" on Magnum can be a bit painful, but I love the feeling. It's borderline safe, it feels like you're going to fly out. It adds to the sheer thrill of the ride. Plus, they just don't make rides like Maggie anymore - the coathanger hills are probably going to be extinct in the near future. That's sad, because Magnum has some of the best airtime hills I've been on. Magnum has insane airtime, and that's why it is still such a good ride after almost 25 years. If they did put B&M trains on it, I hope that they wouldn't staple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XYZ Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 The trains look great and I think this is the first B&M train with 2-abreast seating (other than the Psyclone trains). Â The only problem is the 6' 1" height limit is very low. Now, I can't go on it, but there's better coasters in Japan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3Mutts Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 This is interesting, I would have never thought that B&M would be the ones to replace the trains. Lets hope the ride is more thrilling now than it was before.  Also the man who siad Steel Dragon put Morgan out of bussiness it didnt, they built Superman el Último Escape at SFM in 2002 (opened in 2004 due to government red tape) and bought Chance Rides out shortly after to become Chance Morgan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.J. Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 The heartline on the new trains looks to be higher than the old ones. If that's the case, it would explain the addition of the maximum height restriction - aren't there some pretty tight clearances? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coaster Curt Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 How I would love to see new trains on Wild Thing at VF, the ones currently running are huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lareson Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Also the man who said Steel Dragon put Morgan out of business it didn't, they built Superman el Último Escape at SFM in 2002 (opened in 2004 due to government red tape) and bought Chance Rides out shortly after to become Chance Morgan.  Well, it was part of the reason why Morgan went into bankruptcy. Cost the company more than they originally thought and $52mil was the most ever spent on a coaster up until Expedition Everest when Disney spent $100mil on that. Morgan went under in 2001, not long after they began work on Superman at SFM and just completed work on the Steel Phantom to Phantom's Revenge transformation. Also need to remember that even though a coaster says it opens in 2002, it was really started to be manufactured the previous year.  Michael Chance, the grandson of the founder of Chance Rides, acquired Morgan's assets after they went under with help of a few investors. Then Chance Morgan was formed in June 2001, which picked up the work on Superman el Último Escape, so technically, Morgan started on it, but Chance Morgan finished it.  To put it simply, Chance Morgan and Chance Rides Manufacturing were 2 separate companies with Chance Morgan selling the rides for Chance Rides Manufacturing. Then in 2011 as part of the 50th anniversary of Chance Rides, the companies "merged" and are now all under the Chance Rides name.  Very complicated history, believe me!  -----  I'm still very impressed that B&M pulled this off. Just too bad that I won't be able to ride this coaster now due to the height limit at 6'1". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Posted March 18, 2013 Author Share Posted March 18, 2013 Here's a video with images of the new trains! Â [youtu_be] [/youtu_be] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christianscoasters Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 ^I LOVE The Little Mermaid. I saw that show live twice. Amazing. Pretty horrible song choice for that video, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCT3Bross Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Must say like the trains kinda reminds me of the Hyper trains of B&M with little modifications. But I need to adjust to see a non B&M with the there trains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cfc Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Big and clunky as they are, I've always found the Morgan Hyper trains to be quite comfortable; however, I think the B&M trains could make Steel Dragon a better ride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LawlessBagel Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 The trains look great and I think this is the first B&M train with 2-abreast seating (other than the Psyclone trains). The only problem is the 6' 1" height limit is very low. Now, I can't go on it, but there's better coasters in Japan.  I agree and i might be able to squeeze under the height limit but it would be close. Although lets be honest here, 6' 1" isn't going to be much of a problem for the locals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJLehto Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Pretty cool, though will it make much difference? Well they will be more comfy but what about airtime? The ride is the ride, reckon there'd not be much diff in AT like some have said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loefet Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 I agree and I might be able to squeeze under the height limit but it would be close. Although lets be honest here, 6' 1" isn't going to be much of a problem for the locals.I think that the limit may cause issues among a lot of young Japanese males. The Japanese isn't as short as many believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matteocrepaldi Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 That was a very nice surprize to hear! I still don't quite like those legs restraints and the hight limit but I hope to ride it someday and see how it feels now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcjp Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Well that was unexpected. Those trains are certainly better than the old ones. Still, I find it a bit strange to see a B&M train seating 2 across. I also find rather odd how low the height limit is as there are quite a few tall Japanese people (as some have already said). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Yeti Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 I'll bet the seats are more elevated than on the old trains making the clearance level lower. Considering I'm slightly over 6'1", I really don't think I'd be able to ride. On looks, I'd still say there are better giga-coasters right here in America - so I'm not too beat up about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loefet Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Well that was unexpected. Those trains are certainly better than the old ones. Still, I find it a bit strange to see a B&M train seating 2 across. I also find rather odd how low the height limit is as there are quite a few tall Japanese people (as some have already said). The height limit and the fact that it have 2 across seating with shin restraints all point toward one thing, getting the new train through the clearence envelope that the old ones had. On the old ones you more or less sat at the same level as the loading platform, inside a large box that kept you legs inside at all time. Now these seats are well over a foot and a half taller and wide open to the elements, so they would have to make some compromises somewhere to get them to work. The question though is where exactly are the locations for these tight spaces that require this small clearance profile, the tunnels or at the crossover points at the turnaround? If it's the tunnels then just remove them, they don't really add anything in my view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.J. Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 I would guess that the cause of the restriction is the crossover points in the mess of track at one end of the layout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DougMJr Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 That height restriction is a little disappointing. I'm 5'11", but I have plenty of friends over 6'1". Note to self: Don't take them here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubysparkles Posted March 18, 2013 Share Posted March 18, 2013 Shambhala trains are two seats across. So B&M has done that before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now