Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Cedar Point (CP) Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Check out this amazing photo compliments of Dave Morgan!! 

I feel bad because this is all I post about lately but no... if a park has the ability to open and there's demand and they choose to stay closed then they're dumb. Period. Be creative and figure it ou

Cedar Point should pay people a premium to work there. Unless you love the industry and have aspirations of moving up within it, why else would you work at Cedar Point? - For most jobs, there are

Posted Images

As for top spins They are fun depending on what program they are running. The best one I have ever been on was Tomb Raider at Kings Island.

 

Get yourself to Coney Island this weekend before their Top Spin is sold. That is a crazy program.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd be nice to see Texas Twister from Geauga Lake at CP.

 

They could easily put one in where MaxAir is, which IMO was a huge disappointment. Whatever this new addition is, I'm sure it'll draw even more crowds to CP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
^ When you say "tearing" itself apart... what do you mean by that. And if it is, why is it running?! I would still love to see one of these "Giant Top Spins"

 

The Giant Top Spins at Kings Island has not been running much this year. If you ride the Beast you can see all or most of theming outside of the building.

Link to post
Share on other sites
^ When you say "tearing" itself apart... what do you mean by that. And if it is, why is it running?! I would still love to see one of these "Giant Top Spins"

 

The Giant Top Spins at Kings Island has not been running much this year. If you ride the Beast you can see all or most of theming outside of the building.

 

When I was at KI in July all the themeing on Tomb Raider was working as was the ride.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Having ridden Atlantis Adventure today at Lotte World I am even more convinced that there may be some truth to the original rumors about Maverick being originally designed as an Aqua Trax, then later changed to a traditional coaster train!

 

There were so many similarities that you could compare with the two:

 

- Both rides are part launch, part lift hill.

- Both rides have extremely tight elements and transitions

- Both rides have short ride vehicles

- Both rides come very low to the ground more than a traditional ride.

- Both rides have water elements in them, yet neither actually come directly into contact with the water.

- Both rides can operate multiple ride vehicles at one time.

- Both rides have "dueling elements" where the trains pass each other.

- Both rides loading station are VERY similar

- Etc, etc, etc....

 

And most importantly, from having ridden both coasters within a few weeks of each other, Atantis Adventure "felt" like Maverick. And everyone in our group that had been on both certainly felt the similarities.

 

So that begs the question - If Maverick WAS originally designed as an Aqua Trax what would have changed the parks mind to traditional trains?

 

The only thing we could come up with is capacity. Atlantis Adventure DID take FOREVER to get on the ride, even when they were running 6 cars.

 

And to even further the speculation, I do wonder if the inversion that was removed was designed with an Aqua Trax car in mind, and when the design change took place they had fabricated the extra piece of track just in case it wouldn't work out. I say that only because it still baffles me how they would re-design, fabricate, and ship those pieces of track SO quickly after they realized the inversion wouldn't work. They must have been prepared for the alteration and a change of train type seems like a logical explanation.

 

Anyway, this is all total SPECULATION on my part based on now having ridden both rides, heard stories from some of my "industry friends", and really just using some common sense and logic.

 

Having said that, though I may still be totally wrong!

 

Anyway, both rides are excellent and exceeded my expecations, so regardless of what type of coaster Maverick or Atlantis Adventure are were going to be, they are both awesome and everyone should get out and ride them!

 

--Robb

aquatrax05.jpg.6a133cd584bb7cfee0a6bc76d5f41421.jpg

You're not supposed to get this wet, but when someone in front of you sticks their arm out in front of the fountains, it sprays back on the riders! Elissa was NOT amused! (I'm sure Dan will be laughing his ass off!!!)

aquatrax04.jpg.4115cad0033a65fb93001a8116b694bf.jpg

A lot of the ride is very low to the ground.

aquatrax03.jpg.bbb3f5e1dab2bc50be8915460b8a7845.jpg

Very tight, FAST turns, just like on Maverick.

aquatrax02.jpg.86b248f7dc98a4c92374b39414d12e61.jpg

The ride 'feels' VERY much like Maverick...moreso like Maverick than any other coaster I can think of.

aquatrax01.jpg.947f5dd45f5b3ead73ac72698ca5b99e.jpg

While you can't see it, inside that building is a tophat with a vertical drop and some VERY tight transitions, elements very similar to Maverick.

aqua1.jpg.35cd518ffbfe23bdc97c831bf5c6ca9e.jpg

Is it possible that Maverick might have originally been created as one of these?

Link to post
Share on other sites

^What he said.

 

The only thing missing from Atlantis was inversions, but those trains had more than enough room for the installation of OTSR's if needed.

 

There is also a drop into a banked turn above water on both too...

 

No doubt in my mind now that Maverick was at some point an Aquatrax design.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Atlantis' looks like an awesome ride, i really really want a ride on it...........but, im still happy with whatever decisions Cedar Point had to make to end up creating Maverick. Maverick was so much fun, i almost peed in my pants.

 

(although one particular ride on the bronze train in the back right hand seat was seriously the roughest ride ive had on a steel coaster, must have had a square wheel or even 'no' wheel that day, ouch)

 

Apart from the slow loading times, an Aquatrax still would have been sweet at Cedar Point, why arent there that many of these at other parks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my only question about the Maverick Aqua Trax debate.........Why does Maverick close so quickly at the slightest bit of rain? Is it just the trains? I mean if it was originally an Aqua Trax design wouldn't it have been designed to handle a little bit of water in spots? But overall, I have to agree with Robb, the similarities are just too close to not think that this may have originally been an Aqua Trax design.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's my only question about the Maverick Aqua Trax debate.........Why does Maverick close so quickly at the slightest bit of rain? Is it just the trains? I mean if it was originally an Aqua Trax design wouldn't it have been designed to handle a little bit of water in spots?

Dude, so does Atlantis Adventure!!! I makes NO SENSE I know, but it does. In fact, today was our second visit to Lotte World because when we were there on Monday Atlantis was closed due to rain, so we had to make a return visit there.

 

Keep in mind that the Aqua Trax train never actually does come in contact with the water. Matterhorn's bobsleds have more contact than Atlantis does.

 

--Robb

Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's my only question about the Maverick Aqua Trax debate.........Why does Maverick close so quickly at the slightest bit of rain? Is it just the trains? I mean if it was originally an Aqua Trax design wouldn't it have been designed to handle a little bit of water in spots? But overall, I have to agree with Robb, the similarities are just too close to not think that this may have originally been an Aqua Trax design.

 

That is just Cedar Fair policy after the incident on Magnum.

 

And about the heartline roll being designed for Aquatrax trains... I think it is more plausible for Maverick's current trains to go through the roll than for Aquatrax cars. Maverick's roll was extremly tight, and I think that the longer Aquatrax cars would only worsen whatever problems the roll had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My question:

 

If it were designed as an aqua trax, whats it matter?

 

 

I think its far more plausable to design and fabricate those 3 peices of track than it is to change the design of the trains, fabricate AND decal those in the same amount of time.

 

Speculation, sure. Silly? kinda. Good report and pictures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The trains didn't need to be built in teh same amount of time.

 

If it was originally designed for a different type of train they were probably already well aware that that segment of track would most likely be too intense. But if the barrel roll track had already been fabricated they could put it in and see what the actual forces were, but still fabricate the alternative track just in case.

 

This seems like the most likely scenario. The timing of the replacement track always seemed way to quick. Complicated steel pieces cannot be fabricated, painted, shipped, and installed THAT quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assumed this agrument was over a long time ago.

 

The aquatrax prototype directly lead to Maverick.

 

Future ride designs will likely use the shorter coaster cars that worked so well with Kinga Ka, like Maverick does.

 

Same with the TTD protoype and its themeing, with the future rides Intamin switched to the more traditional design.

 

Now, I am trying to imagine a heavily themed maverick, with unqiue trains in a far off land, sounds like a winner to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maverick is not an aqua trax. I've seen the blueprints, talked to the programmer, and was a part of the re-construction and programming all through the month of May. The ride is a new product from Intamin called the "Ricochet Lift and Launch" coaster, not an "Aqua Trax".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/