Password121 Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 I will say this... If Gatekeeper was at a different park, the enthusiast opinion of it would be infinitely better. Same could be said with Mean Streak. It doesn't quite reach the level of CO's flagship rides, but is a very solid coaster. Personally, I rank it just a hair below Raptor, and well above Mantis (I'll have to ride Rougarou to re-check). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerstlaueringvar Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 I agree that if Gatekeeper is at another park, it will be ranked higher. But this is Cedar Point we are talking about, expecting something much better than average isn't being unfair. If they want a family coaster, why buy something that requires 52"? I guess the wind has a lot to do with it's low speed, a ride that is suppose to be much better became…well…Gatekeeper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GwaziBSRider1 Posted February 16, 2015 Share Posted February 16, 2015 GateKeeper is also one of my favorites at Cedar Point. I'll go so far as to rank it my #3 for this park (after Millennium Force and Magnum). It was the first new coaster at CP that didn't disappoint me since Millennium Force opened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texascoaster89 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 ^Exactly! Not every coaster is going to be mind blowing intense. You need to have a variety of different types of coasters that appeal to different people. Not everyone wants white knuckle rollercoasters. I personally feel a true enthusiast can ride ANY ride and NEVER complain about it because YOU'RE AN ENTHUSIAST! I save up money and fly around each year to ride roller coasters, I don't care what it is. That's being an enthusiast, and I haven't ridden a ride that I said ''well that sucked, NEVER AGAIN!" They really should re-define the terminology among coaster dorks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachPoint07 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 I don't mind Gatekeeper. The first few times I rode it I enjoyed it, it was one of my favorite coasters at the park. The next few times I rode the coaster I noticed a distinct rattle to it. It wasn't enough to hate the coaster but it certainly took a dive in my rankings. I'm excited to try it out again next year to see how well it rides......I hope it's better than last time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mossed Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 With enthusiasm relatively high for GateKeeper (apparently) and excitement seemingly low for a new Dive Coaster. I have to ask, based on the specs of the proposed coaster and our experience with GateKeeper, which coaster do you think you will prefer / ride more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagnumFreak25 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 I'd probably ride the Dive machine more. I like Gatekeeper a lot but the Dive machine will probably be a little more fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GwaziBSRider1 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 It's not fair to compare GateKeeper to a coaster that doesn't exist yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mossed Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 It's not fair to compare GateKeeper to a coaster that doesn't exist yet. What a silly statement. I assure you, GateKeeper's feelings won't be hurt. This is a forum where you compare all sorts of things. People spent months comparing Leviathan to I305 prior to them opening. People have been on both wing riders and dive coasters. But if that question concerns you I'll ask another, "What coaster type do you prefer, Dive or Winged?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GwaziBSRider1 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 It's not fair to compare GateKeeper to a coaster that doesn't exist yet. What a silly statement. This is a forum where you compare all sorts of things. People have been on Dive Coasters, they have been on GateKeeper, and they know the specs of this 'proposed coaster'. It's not a huge leap to make a potential comparison. All we know are some stats; that's it. These stats will probably change multiple times before the coaster is even officially announced. You can't compare GateKeeper to something that we only vaguely know about. If we knew more about this ride, I wouldn't have said anything, but this dive machine is still very much in the dark. Hell, it's not even definite that this ride will even be built. I'm not against speculation by any means, but it's just too early to start this up. My previous post should have been worded better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastKid Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 All we know are some stats; that's it. These stats will probably change multiple times before the coaster is even officially announced. You can't compare GateKeeper to something that we only vaguely know about. If we knew more about this ride, I wouldn't have said anything, but this dive machine is still very much in the dark. Hell, it's not even definite that this ride will even be built. I'm not against speculation by any means, but it's just too early to start this up. My previous post should have been worded better. I hate to be a backseat moderator, but come on, dude. How about you let others discuss what they'd like to discuss, and you keep your rules to yourself. If people want to speculate (as enthusiasts always do), they can speculate. It's not your call to say when it's "too early" to discuss something. Back on topic: I personally feel I'd ride a dive coaster more frequently (as I've ridden them and know what to expect) rather than Gatekeeper (which I've also ridden, to utter disappointment). Wing riders just don't do it for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GwaziBSRider1 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 (edited) GwaziBSRider1 wrote:All we know are some stats; that's it. These stats will probably change multiple times before the coaster is even officially announced. You can't compare GateKeeper to something that we only vaguely know about. If we knew more about this ride, I wouldn't have said anything, but this dive machine is still very much in the dark. Hell, it's not even definite that this ride will even be built. I'm not against speculation by any means, but it's just too early to start this up. My previous post should have been worded better. I hate to be a backseat moderator, but come on, dude. How about you let others discuss what they'd like to discuss, and you keep your rules to yourself. If people want to speculate (as enthusiasts always do), they can speculate. It's not your call to say when it's "too early" to discuss something. I'm sorry for having a differing opinion. Edited February 17, 2015 by GwaziBSRider1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coasterbill Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 It's not fair to compare GateKeeper to a coaster that doesn't exist yet. I agree 100%. Then again it's February and everyone's bored. This usually leads to enthusiasts losing their minds and starting ridiculous discussions. It's an annual tradition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coasterchitchat Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Tony just tweeted that they're severing Bacon Mac&Cheese during Winter Chill Out this Saturday. FYI- Final call will be made Thursday at 5 PM on whether or not it will be held this Saturday or next Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philrad71 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 ^ Serving bacon mac & cheese during the normal park operating schedule would probably still be better than 98% of the food options sold there that are not located within TGIFridays or Famous Dave's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrygator Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 All we know are some stats; that's it. These stats will probably change multiple times before the coaster is even officially announced. You can't compare GateKeeper to something that we only vaguely know about. If we knew more about this ride, I wouldn't have said anything, but this dive machine is still very much in the dark. Hell, it's not even definite that this ride will even be built. I'm not against speculation by any means, but it's just too early to start this up. My previous post should have been worded better. I hate to be a backseat moderator, but come on, dude. How about you let others discuss what they'd like to discuss, and you keep your rules to yourself. If people want to speculate (as enthusiasts always do), they can speculate. It's not your call to say when it's "too early" to discuss something. Back on topic: I personally feel I'd ride a dive coaster more frequently (as I've ridden them and know what to expect) rather than Gatekeeper (which I've also ridden, to utter disappointment). Wing riders just don't do it for me. As a front seat moderator we don't mind the discussion although it is illogical to debate the merits of an existing coasters versus a non-announced coaster. Unless that unannounced coaster is at BGW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mossed Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 Back on topic: I personally feel I'd ride a dive coaster more frequently (as I've ridden them and know what to expect) rather than Gatekeeper (which I've also ridden, to utter disappointment). Wing riders just don't do it for me. Good to know. Any other opinions here on wing rider vs dive coasters?! and I didn't even get on any coasters last season, so my mind is utter mush at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coasterchitchat Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 ^ Serving bacon mac & cheese during the normal park operating schedule would probably still be better than 98% of the food options sold there that are not located within TGIFridays or Famous Dave's. Agreed. I really like the focus Cedar Fair has been putting on food during the Outimet Era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coasterbill Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 Cedar Point needs to do something about it's food offerings. Besides the franchises it's brought in (Chickie and Pete's, Famous Daves, TGI Fridays, Chick Fil A, Pinks and Boardwalk Fries) the food is all amazingly bad. I know Midway Market has it's fans but that's just crappy picnic grove food and I don't know what anyone sees in the place. I love this park but the food selection needs serious help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillrider Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 I agree about the food offerings at the park. Overpriced crap. We always head over to the thirsty pony for our meals. They have great food. It will be good to have the quaker steak and lube this summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagnumFreak25 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 They definitly need better food at the park. When I go I almost always end up just eating at chick-fil-a and pinks. The food in the park of the park is the most crappy thing ever. The front of the park is a lot better, with all the new food places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolandmammoth Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 I have to agree with everyone, the food at Cedar Point isn't great. If your willing to make a 15-20 minute trip, Chet and Matt's is probably the best pizza in Ohio. Mac and Cheese Pizza? Yes Please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grsupercity Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 I used to like the game day grill under raptor, but that's gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrillrider Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 ^Yea...us too. Chickee and petes food was awful both times we ate there. Plus they got rid of the bathroom in the restaurant and the closest bathroom is over at the coliseum arcade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagnumFreak25 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 Chickie and Pete's has a bathroom still, and I actually liked the food I had and it's way better than most places at the park. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now