Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Habreno

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Habreno

  1. First impressions: Ugh, we waited weeks for *this look?*

    But after playing with it for a day or two, I sorta like it. It's... bigger. And just cleaner. I miss the... charm, I guess, of the old site, but that'll probably go away with time and ironing out the kinks.

    Speaking of kinks to iron out... there used to be a subsection of sorts for a thread with the last piece of "news" of that thread in the forum itself. Any thoughts or plans on this part finding its way back?

  2. 2021: More of 2020 with people who aren't going to be as understanding about what's going on because they're going to be impatient assholes who want things to be over.

     

    There are compromises somewhere between your intelligently worded beliefs and the extreme opposition.

     

    Can only compromise with someone who's willing to, and I strongly doubt that most people in 2021 are going to be willing to.

  3. I would pick the front seat of a car. Probably Row 7 (cars are rows of 3). The back seat of a car is going to give you the best airtime, with the middle seat in the back car also being very good comparatively. This rules out rows 12, 9, and 11. 6 and 3 are also back seats but in the front half of the train, where the train is more *pushed* than *pulled*, but still, as back seats, are going to get air.

     

    Row 1 is a great view, but due to that pushing does get some air. Not that much, but still does get some. The only problem with Row 1 is, being the front, it'll get a longer line. As Row 4 is a front seat in the front half, it'll also get some air from this but not nearly as much.

     

    This leaves us 10, 8, 7, 5, 3, 2. Front and back cars are going to get more air in their respective ways due to physics (less to hold them down), ruling out 10, 3, and 2. Of what's left, none of those are going to be great air, but I generally believe the front of a car is less air than the middle, thus leading me towards my recommendation of Row 7. 8 and 5 are decent choices as well, and of the ones ruled out I think 4 would be the best of them.

  4. ^Ah. Fair enough.

     

    Sorry you didn't have a great experience with Knoebels.

    Oh, that's not the case at all. We had an incredible time! The carefree atmosphere is hard to put into words and I think it's a place you truly have to experience to understand it. It was the most innocent fun I've had in years.

     

    Scooters, Phoenix, Black Diamond, Haunted Mansion... so fun! An afternoon refreshing swim and great food. There's really not much to dislike about Knoebels. As far as fascination goes, I just didn't get the hype. Maybe it was because there were some kids just schooling everyone and winning every single prize... It was hard to spend more than a short period of time in there without wanting to go back into the park.

     

    I still need to post a short TR.

     

    Fascination is very much a game of skill. Having won well over my fair share of tickets on it the best thing I can say is to simply understand how the ball will act in certain conditions and be able to aim for general areas on the board. It is difficult to aim for a specific hole outside a handful of them but with practice you should be able to comprehend the physics behind the chaos that is the wonderful game of Fascination.

  5. Long time lurker, first time poster, one comment here needs some clarification.

     

    (I'm hoping nobody has said this yet). My favorite is the myth known as centrifugal force. It's a completely fictitious force, and it still boggles my mind that parks still use it for marketing purposes.

     

    Centrifugal force isn't a myth, it's a perfectly valid force. I imagine your interpretation of the word "fictitious" is tripping you up, you have to think outside Newton's Laws to understand it.

     

    Newton's Second Law says F = ma, if you don't have acceleration you don't have force. But have you ridden in a car around a corner and been thrown to the outside of the car while traveling at a constant speed? That makes no sense, F = ma says there's no acceleration so there's no force! And that's absolutely true, if you're using the standard inertial reference system used by Newton and traveling in a straight line. But if you use a rotating reference plane to account for the corner, rotating at an angular speed "ω" in degrees/second, you find there's an angular acceleration being produced by traveling around the corner. "Aha!" you may say, there's an acceleration which causes a force to be produced, and this is the centrifugal force that is supposedly "fictitious". If you really want to know the math the equation for centrifugal force is F = m*(ω^2)*r, hope that helps you understand why parks still refer to a perfectly valid force calculation when marketing rides.

     

     

    I can't think of any myths/rumors that haven't already been said, some good ones have been posted here for sure.

     

    It actually is not a real force. The correct force is centripedal force. Centrifugal force is an apparent force and not a real force.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/