Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MagnumFreak25

  1. ^They aren't that good at keeping secrets for example GateKeeper and the Sandusky register leak.

    That's only one leaked ride, They haven't leaked anything the past 2 years (except thing on purpose) and I can' think of anything before that. I kindof agree that the leaked memo was fake. There's just to many questions unanswered. How did they even get it? Why was there a memo with only stats about the ride? It's not like B&M was planning on leaving CP in the dark.

  2. There's no proof anywhere that modification's like Intimidator's turn or Maverick's barrel roll are paid for by the parks themselves. My guess is that Intamin pays for those kinda problems. As for Gatekeeper, they didn't have to replace track but it was down for at least a week and a half, a crane had to be brought in and the lift motor may have had to been replaced. Keep in mind that B&M couldn't keep technology from the 1800's running while intamin manages decent reliability from technology that no one's ever tried before.

  3. Few things wrong with you're logic there.

    1) Intamin is cheaper than B&M, if they can afford a small B&M, they can afford a larger Intamin.

    2)Cedar Fair has not dropped Intamin, they just haven't put in one. These day's intamin really only builds launch coasters, family coasters and super intense hyper coaster's are smaller things. B&M has been providing rides that fit the parks better, it's not like they straight up refuse to do anything with intamin.

    3) Yes Intamidator's lift broke for a while, but guess what? So did Gatekeepers!


    I'm not gonna say an Intamin coaster is coming, but it really isn't any less likely than a B&M at this point. All there is is rumors at this point.

  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/