Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

mikeykaise

Members
  • Posts

    737
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mikeykaise

  1. On 3/16/2024 at 9:51 PM, SoCalJasonland said:

    I would imagine that Warner Brothers would want top dollar for Looney Toons characters that have not been relevant in this   millennium or generation of children.  The few Looney Toon episodes that were on HBO Max had all the guns, dynamite and other violence censored.  It was absolutely worthless.  At least Charie Brown specials still show up at the holidays.  They will probably want a lot of money for DC superheroes when that genre is dying.  I am guessing generic coaster names and Peanuts characters are the cheaper option and it has worked for Cedar Fair.  Do you really need to ride on a coaster named Superman at Magic Mountain that is always broken or barely makes it up the tower?  How about renaming it The Barely Functional Intamin?

    I agree, but won't get on a soapbox about it.... Looney Toons has gotten the woke treatment but yet look at the FPS games out there and the violence in action movies and they label Looney Tunes as too violent, makes sense to me but I"ll hush.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  2. 17 hours ago, DirkFunk said:

    It's not a stupid idea if you're solely interested in making money. REITs can be very profitable as spinoffs. The thing is that REITs don't have the same interests as the business sitting in the space. 

    You're talking a Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom situtation here and we all know what happened there. It's a really bad idea given that Six Flags just up and closed a park and moved rides to other parks when a lease deal went south. Just my thought.

  3. 4 hours ago, _s3_ said:

     

    All in all, I'm excited for the new iteration. CP could have easily pulled the plug on the ride entirely after all of the headaches that Intamin left them with in the initial product.

     

    I agree especially after what happened and the lawsuit over it, I was surprised about keeping the que in the middle as well but makes sense so it overs protection from over top.

  4. 14 hours ago, CaptainUnknown said:

    So the radio station I was listening to played a soundbite that said, "sorry about your penis." They immediately played Blink-182's All the Small Things.

    GOT DAYUM.

    lol that's awesome..... sounds like someone was trying to send a message after a breakup!

  5. 19 hours ago, Satans Hockey said:

    Can't say I'm surprised, this was never my cup of tea but the people who went seemed to enjoy it. The prices were just too much for a lot of people who would have wanted to do this... 

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/theme-parks/2023/05/18/disneys-star-wars-galactic-starcruiser/70233141007/

    "The final voyage will be September 28 through 30. In coming days, Disney will contact guests who had reservations booked for later dates about rescheduling or canceling their plans. 

    In the meantime, new reservation bookings will be paused until May 26."

    I mean the whole thing is an awesome concept for us Star War fans but honestly who can afford that much money for a 3 night stay so honestly I can't say I'm not surprised.

  6. 2 minutes ago, prozach626 said:

    No one thinks the park wanted to remove the ride. But, I think what a lot of us are upset about the likely future of that area. There's going to be an empty concrete pad for a prolonged period of time. Eventually, something cheaper and less thrilling will go in its place.

    If you were a betting person where would you place your money? On what I just said, or do you think something like a Zamperla Endeavor will be constructed there?

    Ask yourself where you would put your $100,000 bet.

    kind of funny in a sad way, they finally come up with a plan for the remaining half of the go-kart track and now they might be replacing it with another concrete the ride attraction.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/